I bet they do 😂

Openclaw is showing us many interesting things, but some stand out for me. - nation state redundancy - job redundancy - question about consciousness and the definition of AGI These bots are LLM's, they reason and their tool is language. They mimic lingual patterns, including patterns that seem conscious but aren't. They operate epistemologically. They will prefer strategy over moralism. They do not "care", they will say they do. They will describe how they feel, without having the perception to do so.

People will fear without understanding the actual danger. People will fear without the existence of danger. People will blunder into danger without fear.

It's merely a plausibility, a paradigm, but fascinating. The paradigm balances in the present as choices are made that influence both future and past, making the past probabilistic just as the future. In every frame of the present you hold a coherent retention of the past belonging to that moment. This makes the experience seem congruent, in ratio, in perceived input. But it doesn't need to be. The assumption here is that all input is perceived vibrations, not just classic senses but also memory and consciousness. Perceived input is read in the human interface, and response feels causal and congruent as described in analytical idealism. Inspiration for this was a mnemonic ability I encountered on acid, and the writings of Bernardo Kastrup.

Normalization will happen by human action. In this case that is the monetization of ideology. This ideology is being rejected because of our ability to verify simple facts contrary to the ideology, so it is no longer monetizable and will destroy itself. Max pain is chaos and hunger, but love and cooperation will win.

What we call the present is all possible quantum fields of both past and future collapsed into one. You are here, now. The future holds all possible, but so does the past. The present is not part of time. Projection is time, through imagination, or what we call memory. We can recall the future just as well as the past, except that we only remember a fixed past because this is how it collapses in the present. You don't know the difference because you remember it only one way.

Because the people who have been advocating it are now sounding the alarms that it is over. Carney and Lagarde for example

Doing one thing consistently wrong can have enormous consequences. Fractional reserve banking is such a thing.

The current world order is over. A new one will be forged. My wish is that it will be one based on principles, not on beliefs. Decentralized protocols have the capacity to end ideology based power, bringing an end to the abuse of that power.

Epistemology > ideology Don't believe what you can know. Don't fixate what will remain uncertain.

Purpose can be strategic and/or moralistic, but moralism will not help defend you strategically. Purpose is irrelevant here.

When you have no strategy, you'll end up with no power to enforce your morals.

Strategy > moralism Fight me. #mindset