I’ve followed his content for a long time and I agree with you- he’s consistently on point about pretty much everything. Just my opinion, but the way he’s presenting this is OTT. Saylor is “cooked” only after a very long and pronounced downturn in Bitcoin price. Could that happen? Sure. But it’s being presented as close to a done deal, whereas they have tonnes of runway and the maths simply says that if Bitcoin outperforms 12% a year CAGR vs the dollar (or arguably lower - down to long term money supply growth rate over the very long term if you take into account that STRC dividends don’t compound), MSTR will deliver positive returns in btc terms over time. That’s why it’s sensationalist imo.