Interesting. Haven’t heard this one. What are the various mal incentives? And where can I find more on this?

Oh perfect - a Wikipedia screenshot and a victory lap. Truly elite investigative work. “I know you MAGA types are against research” says the guy who thinks pasting a resume somehow replaces an argument. Congrats, you found a man with a career. That doesn’t magically turn your tantrum into analysis. Also love the pivot from “CNN said it” to “actually it wasn’t CNN” while still waving the screenshot like a hall pass. That’s not clarification - that’s backpedaling with confidence. This has gone from debate, to insults, to credential worship, to whatever this is now. At this point you’re not making a point - you’re just throwing screenshots and hoping one of them thinks for you. Anyway, carry on. This stopped being interesting a while ago.

CNN? Lmao. Yeah man, totally unbiased. Rock solid source. Btw, you seem to really enjoy thinking about my private life. You keep bringing it up like it’s one of your favorite topics - at this point it sounds less like an insult and more like a recurring fantasy you’re workshopping out loud. Anyway, this stopped being an argument like five tantrums ago. You’re just spiraling now.

This had been enlightening Lol. I came for a discussion and left with a full psychological profile, voting record, sexual i, and moral compass — all diagnosed by a stranger having a public emotional collapse. Thank you for your service.

I didn’t “claim self-defense” I described what’s on the video. Whether it qualifies legally depends on the facts, which you’re skipping. Citizenship is irrelevant to use-of-force law. Fear doesn’t make detention unlawful. Blocking federal agents in the roadway and preventing them from leaving is sufficient grounds to detain. Someone who’s “trying to get away” doesn’t stop and box in multiple agents. That behavior is inconsistent with de-escalation. Wheel angle doesn’t negate threat. The vehicle accelerated while an officer was standing directly in front of it. A car used in that way is deadly force. As for the insults and voting fantasies - lol. They don’t change the video.

“Stockholm Syndrome” isn’t an argument. If you think driving toward an officer isn’t a threat, explain why.

Judging a use-of-force incident from a single photo is intellectually lazy. The full video shows the driver blocking agents, refusing commands, and then accelerating toward another agent, nearly running him over. The shots were fired during that moment—not the split second captured in this photo. Context matters, and removing it completely changes the reality of what happened.

Judging a use-of-force incident from a single photo is intellectually lazy. The full video shows the driver blocking agents, refusing commands, and then accelerating toward another agent, nearly running him over. The shots were fired during that moment—not the split second captured in this photo. Context matters, and removing it completely changes the reality of what happened.

October in New England: leaves went full orange candle 📈 10/10 East Coast fall road trip.

really cool!