pollerama.fun

yo

Oh ok. The way I thought about it was that since the value of a person's labor was stolen (I was assuming they would want it back when they found out it was gone), it was equated to making them work for you against their will which would be slavery. I guess threats could be a valid distinction though in both situations the value of the person's labor was still taken against their will.

I agree taxation is mostly immoral. But if someone accidentally drops a penny and you pick it up and don't tell them, did you technically make them your slave? If not, then is it different from how one would argue that taxation is theft/slavery? How? If yes, then are we all technically guilty of it, and does this introduce a problem of watering down the concept of slavery? Is it technically slavery without carrying the same moral weight?

I don't know enough about foreign policy to know the implications of this. I hope it doesn't turn into a drawn out war.

"How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?"

No, state IDs should be used instead.

Yes, but I've been getting tired of it lately. I don't think the algorithm is too good for me.

Leaning no. Sometimes I wonder if the disagreement is mostly semantics.