RDTS has sufficient community support
That was also subverting it Martin Luther was an antichrist
Liar
Completely irrational.
That's a lie.
RDTS is already being deployed as a MASF
Is there a way to get past such psychological bugs?
"We reject Core30's proposed addition of data storage to Bitcoin"
Core30 intentionally enabled attackers to force every Bitcoin user to distribute CSAM. This is a fatal wound because nobody is going to be willing to use Bitcoin if it requires them to do that. (Remember, Bitcoin only works if _most people_ are using full nodes.) RDTS rejects/undos the changes Core30 made. It prevents the CSAM attack. Rejecting RDTS requires creating a counter-fork like Bcash. To oppose or reject RDTS is therefore an explicit action to enable people to force CSAM on Bitcoin. Therefore, if someone actually tries to reject RDTS, the name of their fork is Bpedo.
No, because a counter-fork to reject RDTS would be explicitly protecting the ability to force others to distribute child porn.
Welcome to Luke Dashjr spacestr profile!
About Me
Roman #Catholic, husband, father of 11 children, #Bitcoin Core developer, and CTO @npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze ; INTP; I condemn fake "Catholics", cryptobros & pedos; see full bio
Interests
- No interests listed.