Maybe banks and credit card companies can implement demurrage. Im sure you would love that.

No shit Sherlock. Way to prove the point.

Im sure in NY there are alot of single lonely cat ladys and dog moms. At least they will have food for awhile lol

Just keep betting your little 1 month peanut market down so you can keep talking shit online lol mr. Insurance salesman. We're gonna fork off. Leaving you porn addicts and shitcoiners behind.

Seems like you just want the bail-out of a URSF if core clearly loses so you dont get totally wiped out (you'd still maintain access with your tap trees to the core chain). You frame these bets in a short term bias manner so you can talk shit online lol. Ill be dumping my core chain bags for knots bags once we split. If you want in on that lmk we can work it out.

You think im scared of a wrench?

You think an industrial sized miner will just mine based on percentages post UASF. If the minority chain has 10% of total hashrate why wouldn't they dedicate 10% of their hashrate onto a pool mining that chain? Then adjust accordingly. Makes logical sense to me.

Can't get enough of the slop

Its odd how most core devs/supporters have said or started with "I hate spam too, BUT" Now they have no definition of what spam is? If they can't define what is or is not spam, how are they gonna continue to make development changes to bitcoin going forward? They won't be able to decipher if a change is good or bad because- even they admit that they can't define what is good or bad. How they bicker reminds me of leftists. There is no standard of right and wrong, good or bad, spam or no spam. It's all just feels. 🤡

I did. Trade 1 bitcoin worth on respective chains at market value immediately after chain split.

If the chain permanently splits because core URSFs in response- he would be able to still access his tap tree on that chain. So he would have two core coins and I would be able to access the knots coins a month later. I would follow through- even though I can just dump my shitcoin core version of bitcoin on an exchange for the monetary knots version. Might even get a pretty premium for them amid the chaos. He's also framing these bets/markets on an extremely short time frame because he thinks it boosts his odds compared to a longer time frame.

Every bitcoin fork that has prioritized full node runners and the longevity of pleb nodes has won. I'd be surprised if that isnt the case post Feb 1st. However I think knots supporters (myself included) will have to play the long game. I don't think this battle is won quickly but hopefully I am wrong.

🔥

Im not sure it would or wouldn't. If URSF was the case we would both have two coins on our respective chains? I expect that once the split happens its very unlikely they merge back wiping out cores chain (from less hashrate or core URSFing). Why not just do my proposed bet since he's so confident?

Been a vocal bitcoin maximalist for a long time but never could sell the small amount of monero I held. Last month or so been stacking more even swapping some bitcoin for it. With cores delusional vision of the future and the states digital surfdom goals I cant see a reason not to at least hedge my bitcoin bet with monero. The only question is how much.

That's what I figured. I was wondering what he's implying with the monero mention in the screenshot.

Smells like desperation and slavery.

Ok i was uninformed. My b. I dont like the reactive approach but I dont see anything wrong with the proactive one.

Went to One Battle After Another last night. It was a Hollywood turd. Huge waste of time and money.

Ok im wrong. Im the fuckface.

What is a woman? A woman is someone who identifies as a woman. What is a bitcoin transaction? A bitcoin transaction is something that identifies as a bitcoin transaction. 🤔