spacestr

🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.

Edit
theonevortex
Member since: 2023-11-02
theonevortex
theonevortex 1d

It seems BIP 110 folks are perfectly fine with breaking bitcoin's neutrality, removing important upgrade paths, destroying people's vaults, confiscating coins and causing a split. Awesome.

theonevortex
theonevortex 3d

Remember when everyone was like "hey devs shouldn't 'tinker' too much" when CTV was being proposed, and now people are literally going along with a far more significant update and endless SFing to stop spam. The irony is too much.

theonevortex
theonevortex 4d

lol muted

theonevortex
theonevortex 5d

Bitcoin is freedom money. Bitcoin is fuck you money. Bitcoin is NOT a democracy-good-feelz money.

theonevortex
theonevortex 7d

With the removal of the op return limit in v30 Core recognized that it's important we keep block space a decentralized market and not incentivize a private mempool with backdoor channels to miners.

theonevortex
theonevortex 7d

You don't remember agreeing huh, well were were you even in the discussions on the mailing list, in IRC or in delving in the first place? Do you even understand this discussion goes back to 2014? Or are you just an internet troll who can't even code?

theonevortex
theonevortex 7d

hodlonaut was a clown in 2017, and he's a clown now, the only difference is instead of begging for money he's begging for attention.

theonevortex
theonevortex 9d

See what Knots / 110 folks don't seem to understand is that Core tried to take a stand at the relay level (safer) and literally everyone ignored them. So doing it at the consensus level (far more dangerous) would certainly cause a split, which is exactly what 110 is going to do. And even then it doesn't actually prevent spam as Peter Todd proved when he embedded the entire 110 pdf doc in a 110 compliant transaction :/ So when the split inevitably happens and a future market forms, 110 will be on the losing end.

theonevortex
theonevortex 11d

There is no "project owner" because a maintainer is about as far from an "owner" as you can get, at least learn how FOSS works before making such an ass out of yourself.

theonevortex
theonevortex 11d

No you are wrong. Increasing the op return was issuing harm reduction into a new reality whereby the social contract of a public mempool had been already broken by miners like mara with slipstream. Learn your history because right now you have no idea what you're talking about.

Welcome to theonevortex spacestr profile!

About Me

Former host of The Bitcoin News Show. Creator of https://bitcoindev.org. Bitcoin Is. And that is enough.

Interests

  • No interests listed.

Videos

Music

My store is coming soon!

Friends