I still see a potential way to salvage corechain in the future One main problem contributing to mining centralisation is hashers are not miners. Perhaps the most important people to orange pill right now are actually the fiat minded hashers mining for pools that extract 20-30% of their rewards for the predictability of consistent payouts. If hashers are actual bitcoiners, running their own nodes, and creating their own templates, they would be more involved in discussions on bitcoin’s protocol debates.

Natalie’s interview with Parker Lewis is painful to listen. Props to Parker for being so patient.

where can i go to learn how to organise one myself?

ive unfollowed more people than i have followed since i started here unfortunate

yea, miners’ choice to whether leave the room with a unpinned grenade, or stay

If someone decides to rile up a mob with a retarded softfork, we would know, and a credible URSF will be proposed to counter it. So far for BIP 110, no such sentiment is present. No one would reject a fork to keep Bitcoin spam free.

I wager BIP110 succeeds, will you take up that bet?

Actual bitcoin treasury companies. Value providing, not fiat games.

Hes’ the creator of that vid, hes being sarcastic!