To avoid heart attacks, get your B12 up, reduce your homocysteine levels, get your cholesterols up, get your LDL level up, eat seafood for DHA and omega-3 Dr. Max Gulhane: "It sounds like this changes that you've made individually, now you're doing the research in your emergency department, you're educating some of your colleagues and your juniors. How do they feel when you essentially take the data and you shove it in front of their face about these characteristics of people having heart attack, and it's nothing like this diet heart hypothesis or the lipid hypothesis that you and I were taught in medical school?" Dr. Ankur Vermur: "I think there is a diet heart hypothesis that needs to be rewritten, right? [laughs]" Dr. Max Gulhane: "Yeah. [laughs]" Dr Ankur Vermur: "You eat the right foods and get your B12 up and reduce your homocysteine levels, get your cholesterols up, get your LDL levels up, you know, you'll have good immunity. Another thing that people don't realize, we missed on that, cholesterol is an important precursor for the insulin receptors, right, the lipid rafts and all of that. And I mean, if you're bringing down your cholesterol levels and you already have diabetes, it's only going to worsen your insulin resistance. So, I think there is a diet heart hypothesis, but the only thing is that they've got it the other way around. That can be looked into, right?" Dr. Max Gulhane: "Yeah. And I mean, and seafood, too. I mean, the value of DHA and the omega-3 fatty acids from marine-derived foods is enormously beneficial for reduction in cardiovascular risk. And it makes sense because of its effect on on clotting and coagulation." Dr. Ankur Vermur: "Absolutely." Dr. Ankur Vermur with @ 53:40–55:11 (posted 2025-09-21) https://youtu.be/buEnhj0zfbc&t=3220

Centralized science is being used to harm us. Halogens, bromine, fluoride all have huge effects on oxygen. Injecting chaos. Using light to create chaos. Paying off the media Dr. Jack Kruse: "If you look at the connections in government through Stanford, Stanford and Harvard are two of the most evil empires for a Constitutional Republic. But most people don't realize it. They're almost like weaponized armor divisions pointed at the taxpayer right now. "And people need to understand that centralized science is being used to harm us. They're not shooting bullets at us like they did to Charlie Kirk. They're shooting vaccines at us and our children. That's their weapon of choice. They're using drugs to do the same thing. They're putting atoms in the drugs that act like chronic lead toxicity that get you sick. They do that through halogens, through bromine, through fluoride. These all have huge effects on oxygen. […] Heme and melanin evolved in the great oxygenation event to control all these different things. What are they doing? They're injecting chaos into those pathways that are billions of years old, that have been refined through mother nature through the decentralized network of mother nature, that are buried in each one of our cells. "They have figured out how light can uncouple all those systems to create the chaos that you saw on Twitter, that you saw on MSNBC, that you see on CNBC. People don't understand they're marketing their products. They're paying the media off with their products to keep the system running." Dr. Jack Kruse with Brandon Keys @ 44:34–46:08 (posted 2025-09-20) https://youtu.be/rAoRu3E5FLA&t=2674

Light is capable of creating gender confusion. CYP19A1. Fixable. Teach people how to use the sun properly. A customer for life Dr. Jack Kruse: "Light is capable of destroying your testosterone level. Light is capable of destroying estrogen levels. Light is capable of giving you PCOS. Light is capable of making you want to feel like a girl, or a boy, or be gender confused. OK? That is exactly what light does. […] "What most people don't understand about transgenderism, gay, queer, infertility, they're all linked through one of these heme proteins. […] This came from the story of Turing in '52 and '53, and then MKUltra studied it. And that pathway, the enzyme pathway specifically that DARPA looked into, was CYP19A1. "Most of you would know that pathway when I use the common name, that's called the aromatase inhibitor pathway. And what that pathway is designed to do is balance estrogens, testosterones. It does it through quantum spin, through spin that's present on photons. […] And what does that do? "It affects heme proteins. The heme proteins move their oxidation state when you're in blue light. The other thing that happens is that […] the photolithography in your cells is no longer able to tell the quantum spin of red light vs blue light vs purple light. What does that lead to? It leads to chaos. And what happens when you have chaos in this CYP pathway? That's how you create transgenderism. "Who was the first scientist that figured this out before DARPA? […] It came from Rockefeller medicine in 1927. When they found out that they could use light to control different animals […] they then began to study this. And that program gets sucked into DARPA. […] "We now know how to take control of this aromatase pathway and create the kids that Charlie was out there trying to teach. And Charlie mistakenly thought that he could reason with people who've had this defect brought on to them about light. That's where he made his big mistake. You can't. Once you have this light-induced injury, technically this injury is similar to a TBI, no different than when you hit your head against the wall, say, or in a car when you get an accident. "The only way to fix this problem is you have to use light to change the oxidation state. You have to use light to get the quantum spin number back in your tissues. It takes a while to fix it, but they are fixable. The ultimate cure for this is teaching people how to use the sun properly. Because then what happens? You get back to the default state, and you can fix these problems. "The problem is Rockefeller medicine doesn't want anybody to go back to the default state, because when you are in the pathologic state you begin to use other medications. In other words, reversing the disease makes you no longer a customer. And that's the ultimate issue with them. They want to make sure that everybody stays a customer and everybody stays controllable. That's how the link is between centralized medicine and DARPA. And DARPA is very interested in controlling masses of people. So that is the reason why Rockefeller Medicine has figured out how to do this by using the electromagnetic spectrum." Dr. Jack Kruse with @ 42:47–43:07 & 36:58–41:22 (posted 2025-09-20) https://youtu.be/rAoRu3E5FLA&t=2567

Of heart attack patients in study, most have normal cholesterol, some already on statins. "Why aren't you statining hard enough?" Statins not addressing the true root cause of heart attacks Dr. Ankur Vermur: "I forgot to mention in the study of [about 120 of] my heart attack patients, most of them have a cholesterol level less than 200. Most of them have LDL levels less than 100, maybe the average is about 105 because of the omnivores who eat some meat, so they spike it up a little bit. And that's what we want; we want a little higher ones there. So that's also really, really interesting. We've also got a lot of them who are already on statins, right, after the first heart attack, or they have diabetes and they've been put on statins, as per guidelines, and their levels are absolutely OK. […] Another interesting part is that the guidelines don't ask you to do your lipid profiles when you have a heart attack." Dr. Max Gulhane: "They don't." Dr. Ankur Vermur: "Right? They don't, the guidelines don't say that, you know, you're supposed to start them on statins, right? It's a blanket rule that you give them the loading dose, which is obviously for the, you know, 'cause you know, pleiotropic effect, it has an anti-inflammatory effect at that moment, right? And later on you're supposed to continue them on the statins. And I asked my cardiologist when we were doing all of these tests, 'You know, like the cholesterol levels are normal, the lipids are normal. Why do you want to keep them on statins for forever? Because that doesn't seem to be the cause of the heart attack, especially not the ones with the normal ones, right?' But they can't help it 'cause the guidelines say so. "And you have vultures sitting outside anywhere who can always instigate the patient, 'Oh, you know, like do you want started on statins? Is the doctor trying to kill you?' It happens. You know, I've spoken to neurologists and […] at least a couple of them said, 'We don't want to start our stroke patients on high dose statins, which can be harmful, especially with the patients who have diabetes.' Dr. Max Gulhane: "It's a very interesting situation where it's almost like, you know, the patient isn't statining hard enough. You know, 'Why aren't you statining hard enough? You've come in with your second heart attack.' And they are; they're taking this medication. But it it really speaks to the fact that the paradigm is misunderstanding the true root cause of these patient's illness, otherwise they wouldn't come in with with another AMI." Dr. Ankur Vermur with @ 26:18–28:38 (posted 2025-09-21) https://youtu.be/buEnhj0zfbc&t=1578

Low vitamin B12 levels associated with heart attacks. B12 controls homocysteine. High homocysteine levels associated with cardioembolic disorders Dr. Ankur Vermur: "We all know how important B12 is for us. That's the most important water-soluble vitamin, right, and you get that only from animal products. There are actually a lot of cereals and grains and vegetables that block the uptake of vitamin B12 from the meat that you eat. So, if you're combining your chicken gravy or your tandoori chicken with your carbohydrates and your anti-nutrients, your B12 is not going to go up. It's going to get blocked. […] So, India, like I said, is mostly a plant-based country. […] B12 deficiency is in everybody. Everybody. "In our MI patients, in our heart attack patients, we're looking at a few of the things. We're looking at their lipid profiles. We're looking at the diabetes state with the HbA1c. We're looking at the B12 levels. We're looking at their homocysteine levels. Obviously, the other demographic and epidemological characteristics, like age and sex and smoking and alcohol and what they eat, right? […] And we're taking out the triglyceride to HDL ratios. And it's massive. "I mean every one of them, I think we've collected about 120 patients till now, every one of them has a high TG to HDL ratio which is more than two. I think [..] probably eight to 10 patients have normal B12 levels because of supplementation that they're doing. They're vegetarians but they're taking supplements, which is cyanocobalamin, so they're like 1,500s and 2,000s. Some of them have normal homocysteine levels; most of them still have high homocysteine levels. "The rest, everybody has B12 deficiencies, and by B12 deficiency I mean less than 400, which is not even optimum, because the reference range goes from like 190 to 900 and you get neurological symptoms when you go below 400, right? So you need your optimum levels to be above 400 or 500. […] "If you don't eat B12 in the right way your homocysteine goes out of control, and all of these patients have high homocysteine. So homocysteine is actually an independent risk factor for cardioembolic disorders, and by that I mean you can clot in your lungs, you can clot in your brain, you can clot in your heart, you can clot in your legs, anywhere in your body, right? So that happens. And high homocysteine actually destroys your glycocalyx also. […] So when your glycocalyx is getting destroyed your nitrous oxide is falling down, right? So your blood pressure is going to spike up. It's no longer going to be in control. Then it causes injuries, and those injuries can lead to blood clots. So you have an injury blood clot, and then you have the homocysteine which is causing a blood clot, and then you have the body's defense mechanism coming on as band-aids. That I feel is what is going to cause an atherosclerotic plaque later on when it keeps happening again and again and again and again. "I've had actually patients come in with the second heart attacks and we had done their B12 at the first time. It was low. We did it again. It was still low. Means what? That they weren't given the right direction for dietary interventions." Dr. Ankur Vermur with @ 18:26–21:05 & 21:55–23:20 (posted 2025-09-21) https://youtu.be/buEnhj0zfbc&t=1106

Baseline RF, EMF in central Wyoming is zero. Our baseline should be zero. Get grounded outside. Go camping. Go off-grid for a weekend Logan Duvall: "So before we start tell a little bit, like where in the world are you, and are we going to have technical difficulties, or have we has Elon figured it all out?" Tristan Scott: "[laugs] Yeah, great to see you again, man. I am in central Wyoming. I'm at 8,500 ft at the foothills of the mountains. Uh, no service out here. I brought my EMF meter and the first thing I did testing the RF, EMF exposure is zero out here as a baseline for, you know, whatever the Safe and Sound Pro II measures, 200 MHz to 8 GHz. So, just a reminder that that's what our baseline should be. And then, yeah, I got Starlink Mini. Works really well. I'm hardwired in. And I got solar panels. It's what it's all about. "And that allows me to be grounded outside all day and really taking in and what we'll talk about a bit is the right input signals to thrive. And even though it takes a couple days to get used to being at almost 9,000 ft, and I did run 16 miles in the mountains the first day I got here. So once you get over that, even with it, honestly, my nervous system's like so relaxed. I feel at ease, like I breathe deeply, I'm calmer, able to just like be myself more as opposed to being on edge, stressed out. "And that's kind of what we're kind of this electromagnetic environment. It's really hard for people to grasp because it's so non-tangible, not real, not physical. But to me the best way is go camping, go off-grid for a weekend, turn the phone off and then you'll feel it and you'll realize how much kind of better you feel. And it's, you know, it's not just the light, it's not just the food. There is a non-visible component here of electromagnetism that is extremely underdiscussed and extremely important, but for good reason it's underdiscussed. It's extremely complicated and I'm not going to pretend like I even understand uh a good chunk of it because we're talking about serious physics, serious measurements, variation, cyclicality, all the way to galactic forces causing these things to change and have effects on our biology at at very weak intensities, weak levels. So, and then we have this confounding environment. But anyway, it's a good. . . I was like, 'Do I go into town for this podcast?' I'm like, 'No, I'm staying right here.' [laughs]" with Logan Duvall @ 00:39–03:14 (posted 2025-08-24) https://youtu.be/osM0Wdu0Mh8&t=39

Early supplementation with Vitamin D increases the allergic issues. Vitamin K. Hep B. Least medically intervened child healthiest Dr. Petra Davelaar: "There's all this data that showed that early supplementation with vitamin D actually increases the allergic issues that children have, which I thought was also fascinating, because that's being promoted right now, too." Dr. Doug Sandquist: "Right." Dr. Petra Davelaar: "Kids, give them drops. I'm like, No. Don't." Doug Sandquist: "[…] What about vitamin K? […] That's like the first thing the kids get in the hospitals, right? I mean, isn't that pretty common for most kids because they're worried about the bleed or something like that?" Dr. Petra Davelaar: "It's common and it's toxic, and it should not happen. Yeah, it's it's a terrible idea." Doug Sandquist: "[…] Isn't that a hard one for parents to even say no to?" Dr. Petra Davelaar: "Yeah, I think it is. But you have to make your case, you know." Dr. Doug Sandquist: "[…] My daughter's 17. I remember they offered her the Hep B in the hospital. And I'm like, why would you give an infant Hep B vaccine? […] I can't. . . It's a sexually transmitted disease or it's a bloodborne, you know, unless you're planning on not using sterile technique in the hospital. I mean, there's really no. . . I mean, my infant's not having sex for a long time, so there's no point in that at zero days old. I mean, she got other ones, but she didn't get that one. I mean, I feel bad for parents now with the whole, the vaccine schedule is kind of crazy." Logan Duvall: "My fourth child is the least medically intervened and she is the healthiest, by far." Dr. Petra Davelaar & Dr. Doug Sandquist with Logan Duvall @ 35:44–37:28 (posted 2025-08-28) https://youtu.be/Kb6j8aeqgS8&t=2144

Anemia near end of pregnancy normal. Iron supplementation in third trimester associated with more bleeding and more issues Dr. Petra Davelaar: "One last little piece. Anemia during pregnancy at the end of the time it comes that's normal. It's okay. Don't need to give them iron. And there's this amazing paper from over 100,000 women that they tested in the UK and they found that those women who had supplemented with iron in the third trimester all had more bleeding and greater issues during the birthing process." Dr. Petra Davelaar & Dr. Doug Sandquist with Logan Duvall @ 34:25–34:55 (posted 2025-08-28) https://youtu.be/Kb6j8aeqgS8&t=2065

The blood supply is contaminated Kevin McKernan: "Now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately, because this is very recent work. The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences [the vaccine plasmid DNA] not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. Now we don't know if it's integrated, but it's there. These are studies that weren't looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. All right, so there's at least five peer-reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and vaccinated. And if you dig through that data that's in NCBI, you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients. "There's a study from Ryan et al. that looked at like 75 people in Australia. And there's a great study from Chakraborty that went through that data and demonstrated both Ryan paper and the Odak paper have Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in the patient's blood. "So this means that the blood supply is contaminated. That's a very serious issue if the blood banks aren't looking for it and re-injecting this into other people. This would have normally, I think, caused an enormous halt in any other scenario once you find components of the vaccine that were never declared, that have these links to oncogenic sequences, and they're now floating around the blood supply and no one's doing anything about it. All right. That should be a concern to everybody in the in the transfusion field. "There's three other papers that have recently confirmed this. Now there again these papers were not looking for it. The authors were studying other things. But their data has been peer reviewed and put into the NCBI short read archive, so anyone can comb through their data and find these sequences in there. But the Lee study looked at this, the Knabl study looked at this, and the Krawcyzk study looked at this. All of them, I have documented that there are residual sequences from the plasmids that are in those studies infecting their recipients. "Some of the studies are actually very useful. One of them was looking at a particular disease that I'll point you to my Substack that goes through these. But this particular disease state they did RNA sequencing on to see the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated, and you can see some differential gene expression that's occurring in the cGAS-STING and the interferon pathways. All right, that's the sign of potential DNA stimulatory response. OK? "So some of the RNA sequencing is actually quite revealing as to what the nature of the contaminant is because you can see certain gene expressions get turned on or off that are signatures of a cGAS-STING-like event that could be induced by the DNA that's there." @ 27:45–30:40 (posted 2025-06-10) https://rumble.com/v6uhd1d-presentation-to-new-zealand-commission-on-mrna-vax-contamination-of-the-blo.html?start=1665

Red light is still a stressor at night Jakob: "I have one question. Can we get overexposed to red light? I mean, let's say that in a perfect world where everything was like your place […]" 25:31 Dr. Jack Kruse: "You can, because technically light at night is a problem. Just remember how we evolved. Never forget the story of nature we talked about in the first part podcast. I told you that artificial light screwed up the Neanderthals when they were inside in the caves, and then they started writing cave paintings down. That's how they got destruction of melanin and created dopamine. People think that this was progress; it wasn't. It was cognitive de-evolution. Why? Neanderthals had bigger eyes and 125 more grams of brain tissue. This is the reason why they had the big head and the big brow. They lost that. So it turns out even fire at night is a problem. It means light at night's a problem. Remember, red light is still a stressor at night. "But the reason we don't talk about it that much on podcast is because you guys want to know on relative basis, is red light at night a better choice than the modern lighting we have? the answer is yes. "But your question was very different to me. You said, 'Jack, can red light also be a problem?' The answer is yes, because it generates a cortisol stress response, and that can actually lower melatonin production in your mitochondria. "So the accurate answer to your question is yes, it can be a problem. We want darkness at night." Dr. Jack Kruse with Mads Tömörkènyi & Jakob on the Holistic Disclosure podcast @ 25:20–26:57 (posted 2023-12-18) https://youtu.be/0IjUzKzfIbI&t=1520