What in the world are you talking about? The point is trying to fix node policy filters, fix bugs introduced with Segwit the Core devs refuse to fix, and limit some areas of consensus that have been big areas of spam abuse. Also, limiting OP_Return down to prevent Bitcoin becoming a file storage system with potential dangerous outcomes. You gotta be careful. The Core-advocates are making up all kinds of stuff. I'm not aware of any lawsuits (fill me in if you are). I think the initial release of BIP444 had a conflict with some old, rare method of multi-sig, but that has been fixed as far as I know.

That's true, you are free to troll and risk ruining Bitcoin and all sorts of things like that. You don't need me to understand your why, I guess.

Victoria, BC checking in! 🇨🇦

I can understand people not liking Luke or Knots' approach. I can't understand people purposely running v30. 😔

Some things never change, eh?

😂

So, does that mean you're trimming trees for Sats? Or, the much more interesting concept of a woof-fired Bitcoin miner? 😂

Yeah, that could certainly be the case, as well. But the thinking here was poor regardless. Straw-man, poisoning the well, etc. False analogy to the situation the argument was trying to defend.

I don't know Greg at all, and maybe he's a brilliant coder, but his thinking skills (as demonstrated the last week that I've seen) are very, very poor.

ASICs can only do a very specific task. ASIC (Application-specific Integrated Circuit) They are very high performance in that one specific thing. But, as Jeff said, AI is competing for the energy and infrastructure.