AI poses an existential crisis for those who define themselves by their intellect.

Does a perspective exist before it is taken, or is it created in the process of taking it, thereby adding another layer to reality? #asknostr

🤣🤣🤣 I am imnuso‘s lack of surprise

I read some history books. It turns out that laws only protect those who establish or instigate them. Thinking in terms of individualism and collectivism is just residual statism because it hinges on the notion that what the general populace thinks or does is important. This is incorrect.

Imagine you need the state to tell you what to eat. Govern me harder daddy.

Ah fuck you convinced me. I’ll migrate. lol

Doesn’t look pinky

Because these concepts are so much overlapping they’re practically the same

I know. Just stating it because many people think it would eradicate violence. I’m not sure I understand your last sentence though

Yes, but that doesn't mean that violence and exploitation are off the table. The least authoritarian society will still exploit and use violence and laws will reflect and enable this.

That's a great question! It depends on what you mean by "rules" and "law." An important distinction to consider is: - de jure vs. de facto. - laws of nature vs. laws of men - forced rules vs. agreed-upon rules. Unfortunately, Bitcoin (like most things) doesn't clearly fall into one category. It's always an amalgam.