Blitz wallet, Wallet of Satoshi, Breez SDK and things built with it. Spark is everywhere

Only a few hundred million people will be able to use lightning directly self custodially because of how many channel opening txns can fit in a Bitcoin block Others will be inevitably pushed to use trusted/centralized systems So many Bitcoiners don't want to acknowledge this fact as if lying to themselves will somehow fix this

Once I am free a bit, I will type out the different experiences I had using it

DigiLocker used to be very shitty. When I started using it (before I found Bitcoin), you could open the app to show your driver's license or Aadhar card etc to the cops, and they could verify the authenticity of it, but the app won't work most of the time, so even they would only accept a physical copy Now with it's OAuth like flow, it's actually useful for sharing your KYC info with apps that support it, without revealing your actual documents. But now I have no use for it anymore

Using giftwraps?

Also deploy https://github.com/verbiricha/goalz to another subdomain 🙏 heya.fund has been discontinued

Even a chair is made out of electrons and shit. But if someone asks what it is made of, any sane person would say metal or wood etc. I'm being dead serious, you should get yourself checked or talk to your loved ones about it. The way you are thinking right now shows very clear signs of mental illness

Which app is he using?

https://nostr.at/ Oldest kind 1 note I could find

Andrej Karparhy said something interesting in his interview with Dwarkesh. We know that training these models on large amounts of data produces cognitive capabilities, that's why larger models are better at doing things. But we don't exactly know what parts of the model is actually responsible for it. If we can figure it out, then we can make smaller models much more capable even though they'd be much less knowledgeable If that's the direction it takes, then eventually I expect to have some standard smallish models that can be fed huge datasets according to your needs, and companies will use these to create knowledge specific models that can run on your regular devices. Or models that can learn stuff on demand on your own system

I will often open a client and wonder what standard/NIP it uses, and there would be no information about it. Many times I had to clone the repo and ask Claude Code to find the kinds used there and search for any open PRs etc in GitHub to find the actual NIP

Nostr clients should add a link to the NIPs that they implement, maybe also a link to the apps that are interoperable with it. More important for special purpose clients compared to genral ones

By everywhere I mean it has definitely been adopted by companies and developers from many different places, which I didn't expect to happen for a new L2 this fast They built a great product and SDK, although they should have tried to make an open protocol instead (with a BIPs, NIPs like specification). Also, their biggest marketing point is the stablecoin and token support, and privacy is not a priority yet, even though Ruben Somsen's original statechain design six years ago already came with blind signatures for ecash level privacy

This is the post, I am not sure if Niel thought about making it interoperable with existing DMs but I liked the design and it was in my mind since then to make an email like interface for NIP-17 DMs

Found it, it was , now need to find his post

I personally think it's better if we migrate NIP-17 to be for mail like stuff. Day to day DMs are better suited for Marmot (NIP-EE) Someone had already created a prototype or design for it. He was working on a nostr client of his own or just designing it not sure. Don't remember his name and can't find him in my follows now either

can't it just be the kinds in nip-17 with an extra subject tag or something?

As an implementation or as an alternative to the njump.me instance?

Dark mode is in the works, probably coming next release

Even YouTube has a 5k items limit on your watch later list, I think a limit like that on follow list entries on nostr would be good. YouTube can easily manage hundreds of thousands of entries and still chose to impose this limit and people are okay with it