More than ever, we can’t let Bitcoin drift into the control of a few big companies. Once Bitcoin development turns into huge orgs with oversized teams, engineers each owning some tiny slice of a giant internal subsystem, the whole thing loses what made it powerful in the first place. Bitcoin must stay something individuals can run, understand, build, and compete on.

midwit take, poor understanding of the situation, copy paste core talking points. you just wanna reply to him irl and shut him up at every poorly constructed argument. sad to watch. such poor understanding.

long waited video https://youtu.be/a9Q6WmzWYFw

if i find a block today, i will work on my bitcoin client day and night. then go work at a fast food place, i really wonder how it feels like. maybe meet some people there. then work on my other projects.

i know it doesn't mean "im selling everything". we all use our bitcoin when we need to.

many core devs dont have no stake in it. mechanic has stake in it. he doesn't say that he doesn't hold any bitcoin.

GM, nostor

against

"I recognize the council has made a decision. But given that it is a stupid ass decision, I've elected to ignore it!"

THE Goal is to create a strong bloodline that can fight with demons.

GM i know its weird BUT, i want Square to fail in flames just because of this shit. and i want a company with real bitcoiner values to take their place:

4

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hhEXQHLWfkg&t=1150s

who is that?

you said up but price was lower?

i have no fucking idea, lower maybe

lower, sorry

So much common sense in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUxoWebFDWo

Rug The Spammers

bitcoin chain is too big. it might be the smallest but still too big.

send it to an OP_RETURN gone forever.

im nostr only. only way i use X is, i see some tweet somewhere like on a yt video or a screenshot on nostr, etc. and i go and reply or like the tweet or follow people.

Sharing videos helps Bitcoin.

GM

sometimes i talk too much GN

"open source is in cRiSis." "open source needs mOre mOney, bigger teams, massive foundations…" no it doesn’t. we don’t need more. we need less. we need dedicated devs, small, focused groups who can build the foundations used by millions, even billions of devices. and that shouldn’t be treated like a flaw. it’s the proof of human creativity, ingenuity, and the willingness to carry meaningful responsibility. money shouldn't be a motivator. bitcoin development shouldn't be done by practically employees.

as far as i know, issue is you can derive the private key from public key. current bitcoin solution to this is, hashing the public key. because quantum computers are not that great at reversing hashes. many bitcoin address types are actually hashed public keys. so you only reveal your public key while spending your coins. and bitcoin best practice is using the same address once per utxo or per deposit. and when you spend this utxo many modern wallets will also use a new bitcoin address as change address as well. so you only reveal your public key while spending the utxo, and once you reveal the public key that address already becomes empty. so the only issue here is the lightning, because when you create a lightning channel, you also reveal your public key. but this time the revealed public key has access to the funds on the channel. im not sure if this is possible with bitcoin's scripting but one solution to this might be (without a new quantum address type), rotating the ownership of your side of the channel to a new address, every time you interact with it.