I have a love-hate relationship with the contentious nature of the bitcoin community One one hand it can often be totally counterproductive with bitcoiners losing sight of the fact that BTC is way more strong/resilient than any of us, we can't 'misuse' it if we try On the other hand, arguing with people is the best way I know how to clarify my own opinions. Sometimes I need someone to call me a shitcoiner to figure out if I'm right or not

Who coined the term eatery? Such a bad name. It's like calling a school a learnery. It's not even a loanword

You refer to yourself as a pleb lol

Do you think that makes you special? What have you done for Bitcoin during that time?

I think it's an extreme, unrealistic example to bring up. There is no reason why this would be put onchain, especially on Bitcoin. I've never heard of it happening on Ethereum or Solana for instance, which both allow for far greater quantities of arbitrary data storage, and have done so for years…

Core isn't a singular entity that can 'say' something It's an open source project that serves as the reference implementation

The fact you think people are putting that on-chain is telling about what type of person you are.

If you don't store JPEGs, you aren't running bitcoin

The garbage cans are overflowing. V30 expands the garbage cans. Knots wants to keep the same size garbage cans because they fear increasing the garbage can size will encourage more trash

Nope to what? This is a very good analogy Banning litterers from the park at least partially contributes to people not littering Same with filters partially contributing to most transactions not being "spam" You can also make the argument that adding garbage cans encourages people bringing their trash to the park, just like filterbois say removing datacarrier limit will encourage spam

How did you find out about Nostr?

BTC is a protocol

If you don't want to talk then don't reply publicly to a thread? You sound like a bot.

Nope

False