Legit, credit to Nifty for letting him speak on the topic.

Yes... Because it's our podcast. Not his.

I don't work for Knut.

I draw the line at personal insults. You do that, you're just a troll. GTFO.

Fuck off, troll.

I see zero actual harms from 110. A couple of niche use cases will need redeveloping. No risk to being able to self custody or send Bitcoin for normal users.

It was more inertia than anything. I had my node running the 110 client, and I knew I could always change versions later. To a certain extent, I was just waiting and watching. Then my node actually stopped responding, and I needed to wipe and reinstall to get it back up. That took longer than I expected, and by the end of it I had reasoned my way back to 110 support. Sorry for any offense, it wasn't intentional. It was more of an anecdote that I had never turned the signal button off.

This is taking "value is subjective" to an absurd place. Bitcoin isn't for everyone's meaning. It's for money. The protocol already has rules. More rules is fine.

Yes :)

I'm live on Stacker News right now! https://stacker.news/items/1524157 Ask me about Bitcoin cybersecurity, BTCHEL, BIP-110, or anything else!

Join me in a few hours and AMA!

Tldr since the Guy interview: I find 110 activating smoothly to be the least risky and least chaotic scenario. I was getting the game theory steps a bit wrong. Something longer coming when I have time to write everything down. Also a few more pods.

Apparently you haven't kept up with my X. I should really make an update on both platforms.