
canât imagine why⌠đ thanks for engaging with the community and making this a place more than an echo chamber
đ This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Editcanât imagine why⌠đ thanks for engaging with the community and making this a place more than an echo chamber
Like I said, take it or leave it, but âleftâ vs. âleftistâ is being lost on most people in the exchanges that Iâm reading here on Nostr, regardless of what they âshouldâ know. I just think that in these charged conversations, nuance is often lost. Gotta keep it at a 3rd grade reading level, and âleftistâ as a technical term ainât it
I just think all these terms get thrown around haphazardly by most people. Right wing politicians would love to blur the lines between Leftist and left-ish. So even though you might be using it in a more technical way, I just donât think thatâs how itâs always perceived, especially for those who arenât actually that involved in politics, and donât really know the difference. You can take this advice or leave it, but I think youâd get less pushback if you subbed âleftistâ for âleft extremistâ or something like that.
the people in the comments are saying this not to fight with you, but because they know youâre one of the best weâve got, and we donât want to lose you to the political whirlpool that seems to suck in everything good. In the last few days, your posts have used the term âleftistâ far more than ever before, and specifically I think you are referring to âleft extremistsâ, which you outline in one of your posts, but for most, I donât think this is obvious. The term âleftistâ is NOT universally accepted to mean an extremist on the left. For most people, it just means that they have more liberal leaning political views. That is the dictionary definition of a âleftistâ. So when moderate liberals who are a fan of you and your work read your posts and are moved to comment that you are being divisive, I think itâs because they feel like youâre lumping them into this category. I think itâs a really good thing for Trey to step in because he can be a foil to you in some ways, to rally the Nostr-left around productive, unifying perspectives. In this particular case the person who died aligns strongly with your personal choices and values as a father, Christian, American, etc. and that is something that I can respect deeply on a personal level. But I think that the outcry from your followers on Noster is due to the fact that you have been such a leader in a bigger mission that unifies a diverse group of perspectives. Of course it is your choice if you want to use your platform to switch your focus, but I think I speak for many of us who hope that youâll keep pushing in a direction that focuses on these universal truths and rights that we as Americans believe in that bridge the gaps between left and right: personal freedoms, and sovereignty. You and I undoubtedly disagree on a lot of personal issues, but I respect your perspective and I am grateful for your championing of these universal rights that can unite people of all viewpoints.
Agreed, and I certainly see plenty of that from some people here, but I also see plenty of people engaging in good faith, who are misunderstanding the intent whether because they genuinely donât understand (see point about 3rd grade reading level) or because they are bringing a bias into the conversation. Maybe youâre not going to change many minds that are already biased in one direction, but you can certainly avoid pushing away those who donât understand. And the optimist in me wants to believe that with the right message you might even find common ground with a few of the biased participants who are genuinely open to hearing other perspectives.