I'd guess it's people ethically aligned with what nostr aims to be that will stick around. That's who to approach, in my opinion

for music: https://strudel.cc/workshop/getting-started/ random similar visuslisation software: https://hydra.ojack.xyz/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iu5rnQkfO6M

Live coding trance musichttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iu5rnQkfO6M

Funny how much of this kind of elitism touches. Rob Pike on Go: "The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. They’re not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt."

More going on with immutable linux distros than I realised https://jnsgr.uk/2025/09/immutable-linux-paradox

https://www.ee.torontomu.ca/~elf/hack/recovery.html

Expensive bed requires an internet connection (and online AWS servers...) https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/aws-crash-causes-2000-smart-beds-to-overheat-and-get-stuck-upright-3272251/

Prediction time. Those who believe in bitcoin tend to believe other things will also be world-changing technology. Specifically, they tend to overestimate the speed of adoption and impact of AI. In my opinion, they incorrectly think a change that will take multiple decades (if not longer) will happen in a decade. Believing you're a philosopher king due to being enriched via bitcoin compounds the issue. Surprising how often this bias seems to hit. I think LLMs are one trick, and it can only cut so deep. Unless they pull another rabbit out of the hat, I expect little to no improvement in AI over the next decade.

Straightforward explanation of US bubble: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXCVrLPTUHQ