"Mentioned event not found" and here was I, as non trucker and non hiker, curious to see why forests beat supermarket lots.
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
"Mentioned event not found" and here was I, as non trucker and non hiker, curious to see why forests beat supermarket lots.
As long as he's happy and fulfilled that's all cool and giggles 😊
Watching now, thanks 😉 I am a simple man, I use primal web from tor browser
Sorry to hear that, I don't think that a mother should be made to feel "free" from her children, but I guess you're doing the best you can with it.
"...money that you can keep in your head... under a very clearly articulated set of rules..." suuuuuuuuuuuuuure
By now I think you might be trolling and having some fat laughs. You keep bashing anarchocapitalism, which is just a name given for convenience to deductive ethics, and pushing agorism which I am not sure you know what it actually is. Unless your view is collectivist in nature, and thus incompatible with agorism, anarchocapitalism is the only framework where the ethics of private property is actually respected, and to which agorism adheres. But maybe you are against private property, I don't know anymore.
I guess in the end all you say is cool as long as you don't expect to use violence to make others do things... which is what anarchocapitalism actually is all about.
This took me way longer than I care to admit to be understood.
So the conclusion of your notes as of late against anarchocapitalism, is "go live away from other people, be your own producer for everything or set up your micro agorist society"? You would go back to the middleages? I honestly can't even. What do you define as "aggression" or "initiation of the use of force"? Do you agree that the above are always wrong? In this "economic coercion" concept of yours, you would rather have the people currently being economically coerced, move away from society and maintain themselves in everything? How, since they are in the first place "economically coerced" to take a job as employees to sustain themselves? Which "non-megacorp" company would you contract so that you can access the internet and use bitcoin? Which, to obtain hardware? Affordable clothing? Anything else?
Oh but the government does care about all of us, just not in the way someone might think.
Austrian economics be like "mind your own fucking business kthxbai"
If there were no taxes that the government wants to take out of you then yes retiring would be completely optional and left to private initiative, but since there is a clear mismatch of interests in the current system, yes that is a strongly debatable opinion indeed.
These are the widespread arguments, to which I add that, other than requiring way more time in flight to reach the destination, when compared to other flying vehicles, the longer you stay in the air, the higher the statistical probability that something (anything) can go wrong.
Way slower. Arguably costlier. Undoubtedly i. Way bulkier. Susceptible to wind.
Interesting, so your idea is that it was an unlucky combination of genetic factors that drove you to that? Probably hard to verify but something like it, other than not impossible, would be absolutely causative for character development issues that have no relation with parents. But it means you could pass it to your own children. I'm still convinced that, were you genetically driven to addiction, you would in fact still be an addict right now, and that your parents could have put in place an intervention, or have you checked, or go through therapy, but I am now imposing, so I'll peace out :)
A father who does his best to be peaceful, in a world afflicted by violent states. ----------------- Un padre che fa del suo meglio per essere pacifico, in un mondo dominato da stati violenti.