It does not seem to be something he would write. He has no interest in writing that and it would be stupid

Is this a real tweet from Elon??

Yes. However trying to change consensus rules without broad agreement is not a good thing either even if the change itself is positive - I agree with Giacomo here. It must be very hard to change consensus. IMO we should convince people / nodes to change their relay policy back to 80 cap on op_return and to solo mine with ocean defining their own block (at a cost in terms of expected profit and loss) as decentralized mining is very important too.

That’s not what bip 110 do : it changes rules at consensus level. knots itself allows you to run relay policy that is stricter (probably possible in core to but default much laxer and completely relaxed for op_return in core30)

I don’t understand why core 30 changed that. Even before core 30 a motivated attacker could (one of the arguments of core for changing) and it was indeed a situation where 99.9 pct of nodes were a running restrictive relay policy. And if you believe that most nodes having a restrictive or relax relay policy does not matter you can’t be mad at core 30 for changing that. So my position is : “I wish consensus rules were different but they are the way they are and changing them is not not-costly and should be done carefully” and “I wish core did not change relay policy rule let’s continue to try to gather consensus first on this”

You are right ; we should continue. 20% of knots and 20% core 30 so 80 pct network running 80 capped op_return. I would have preferred consensus to have capped op_return but the conservativeness in changing consensus is very important too (and, less so but also, the simplicity of consensus rules) I disagree with changes implemented in relay policy by core. I believe it is reckless and arrogant. core has too much influence on the network through this type of changes I agree. But I am also happy that core can’t change consensus rules too easily. I also want home solo mining to increase and I believe it will and we should aim for as much as possible designing own blocks through ocean Then for BIP-110 itself I understand the motivation, the frustration etc, I am hesitating but it might be (at this stage at least) a bad precedent if it were to succeed and if does not reinforce core

KYC: Kill Your Customer https://www.lefigaro.fr/faits-divers/yvelines-un-homme-et-une-femme-sequestres-a-leur-domicile-900-000-euros-de-bitcoins-derobes-20260309

Does it have a special purpose the pumice? Also the whipped cream tallow it is for the face right? I use it for the face and find it great but checking 🤷‍♂️

Same, just received some, kept half gave half for people to see how much better it is! And the whipped tallow cream is amazing!

Yes since then, I understood that once again you were right 🤓😀 and this is indeed the decisive argument.