Most them dont have NOSTR either

Speak truth

https://whyismoneybroken.com I have been creating many things with AI lately, this is one of them

https://whyismoneybroken.com/article-mycelium thanks for inspiring this thought in me.

I don’t buy Len Sassaman as Satoshi. Sorry. While renowned cryptographer Len Sassaman is frequently cited as a top candidate for Bitcoin's creator, significant evidence and expert consensus suggest he is not Satoshi Nakamoto.The primary reasons against the Len Sassaman-Satoshi theory include: 1. Activity After Sassaman's DeathThe 2014 P2P Foundation Post: Len Sassaman tragically passed away in July 2011. However, the official Satoshi Nakamoto account on the P2P Foundation forum posted a message in March 2014 stating: "I am not Dorian Nakamoto". Unless Satoshi’s account was compromised or pre-programmed, this post entirely rules out Sassaman. 2. Contradictory OS and Tech PreferencesThe "Mac User" vs. Linux Disconnect: According to Sassaman's widow, Meredith L. Patterson, Len was fundamentally a Mac user. Conversely, the early Bitcoin source code and development environment were entirely tailored to Linux and Windows. Satoshi famously had to request help from the community specifically to build the original MacOS version of Bitcoin because they lacked the environment or familiarity to do it themselves. 3. Public Denial by His WidowDirect Refusal: Patterson has explicitly and repeatedly stated that, to her knowledge, Len was not Satoshi. While cypherpunks are known for extreme privacy, those closest to him maintain that Bitcoin does not align with the specific projects he was actively building at the time, such as the Mixmaster anonymous remailer. 4. Different Cryptographic Focus AreasCode vs. Protocol Philosophy: Sassaman was a world-class expert on decentralized anonymity, specifically remailers and peer-to-peer privacy networks. Bitcoin, in its earliest form, was heavily criticized by pure privacy advocates (including Sassaman's peers) because its public ledger (the blockchain) is pseudonymous rather than fully anonymous.Coding Style: Early Bitcoin code was written in standard C++ and featured clever but occasionally messy, pragmatic architecture rather than the highly disciplined, academic code structure typical of Sassaman’s background.