That's exactly what I thought tbh 🤣

Stay tuned for the next version.. more good stuff to come 👀

Hey , signing events using remote signers requires a heavy back and forth communication between the client and the bunker, therefore, encrypting, decrypting, signing and publishing events is not practical and will result a very undesirable user experience that way, until we figure out a better solution for this, you can always enjoy messages using other methods of signing 🙏

Stay tuned for our next version.. 👀

That's too much cheeks 😂

hey , thanks for the feedback, the bug has now been addressed and it is working properly 🙏

Can you record a video if possible to investigate more, I could not reproduce the issue, by also using your current account and a freshly created one, appreciate the help 🙏

Can you share the URL of the relay so we can test it out?

Hey, what kind of signer are you using? If you signed using an extension, make sure to approve the message popped out from the extension window, if you’re using a remote buncker, make sure as well to approve all permissions and sometimes signing needs to be approved manually where your buncker is located.

Ni hao my friend!