Leftists today repeat the same strawman about a monopoly they did 50 years ago. Even though today most people haven't even heard of the companies that were supposed to be running the entire economy by now. The image on the left is a real question Ayn Rand was asked on the Donahue show. She explained, that in a actual free market it is virtually impossible to establish a monopoly. Monopolies and market control are established by using government power. Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1570422941756457

It’s cheaper this way Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1561832492195822

Drop your thoughts below 👇 Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1445113387647917

In 1933, Hannah Arendt was detained by the Gestapo for researching Nazi antisemitic propaganda. She escaped Germany and spent the next 18 years stateless: no country, no citizenship, no legal protection. Stripped of membership in any recognized political community, she experienced what she would later call being "superfluous", the terrifying sensation of belonging nowhere and mattering to no one. That experience became the foundation of The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951). The theorizing was based on what she had experienced first hand. Her conclusion defied everyone who read it. Scholars expected an anatomy of Nazi ideology. Economists expected an argument about class collapse. Psychologists expected a study of mass hysteria. Arendt gave them something stranger: totalitarianism doesn't grow primarily from ideology. It grows from loneliness. Not sadness. Not poverty. Not ignorance. Loneliness: the experience of having no place in a shared world. The word she used: atomization. Arendt observed that the masses supporting totalitarian movements were not, primarily, true believers. They were people who had lost their voluntary bonds: family, church, civic groups, real friendships. When those bonds dissolve, individuals become atomized: isolated units with no shared world to anchor their perception of reality. Atomized people don't evaluate ideologies on their merits. They reach for any movement that makes them feel real again. That offers structure. That offers belonging. The content of the ideology is almost secondary. Arendt separated three states of being alone. Solitude: being alone with your own thoughts. This is healthy. It's where moral judgment forms. "Never was he less alone," Arendt quoted Cato, "than when he was alone. Isolation: cut off from political life, but still intact as a person. Tyrannies produce this. It's serious, but survivable. Loneliness: total abandonment. The sense of having no place in the world at all, confirmed by no one. In this state, the internal dialogue that produces moral judgment breaks down. The person becomes, in her word, "one": unable to think from the standpoint of others. Only loneliness produces what she called the "mass man": someone who can no longer distinguish fact from fiction, and who is desperate for any logic that makes the world cohere. The totalitarian offer to the lonely person: An identity. A purpose. An enemy. A group that makes them feel, for the first time in years, that they exist. Ideology doesn't persuade the atomized. It replaces the reality they've lost. Truth is optional. Consistency is the only requirement: internally logical, total, uncompromising. That's exactly what Nazism and Soviet Communism delivered: a world where everything made sense, even the terror. Arendt published her warning in 1951. Look at what the data shows in 2026. The World Health Organization now links loneliness to an estimated 871,000 deaths annually. Half of American adults report feeling lonely. Among 18-to-24-year-olds, that number reaches 50%. The civic institutions that once held atomization in check—churches, local associations, civic organizations, stable neighborhoods—have been hollowing out for decades. Digital life simulates connection while deepening the reality of isolation. Arendt identified the soil in which any authoritarian movement can take root. That soil has not been this fertile since the 1930s. The truth is that lonely people don't evaluate political arguments on their merits, but on whether accepting them produces belonging. When a large enough portion of a population is atomized, the movement that offers the strongest sense of identity wins. Not the one with the best ideas, the most historically grounded arguments, or the most defensible policies. Arendt watched this happen in real time, in Germany, across the 1930s. She was describing one she had survived. She offered no political program. Her antidote was the reconstruction of voluntary bonds: real people, real places, real shared action in a common world. That is the only answer to what she feared, and it has to be built deliberately, by people willing to show up for it. In 2024, fifty people from different backgrounds met in Philadelphia and wrote a declaration to renew that commitment for this generation. They called it the Philadelphia Declaration. It begins with a simple premise: freedom needs community to survive. It is an invitation to be part of the reconstruction Arendt believed was the only real defense against what she witnessed. Read it. Sign it. Add your name to something that lasts. 👉 https://buff.ly/a9RLXw7 Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1444603294365593

Freedom is fragile. It survives through habits of restraint, respect, and a willingness to question power. Source: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1654478475594676

Que líder? #animação #engraçado #comedia #humor Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1BCyFuyKm7/

Most people aren’t reacting to free exchange or voluntary trade. They’re reacting to a system where giant corporations get special treatment, where losses get socialized and profits stay private, where connections matter more than competition. That isn’t a free market. That’s statism dressed up in a suit. When people say they hate “capitalism,” what they usually mean is they hate bailouts, subsidies, regulatory capture, and backroom deals that lock out smaller players. They’re frustrated with a game that looks rigged, because in many cases, it is. But the rigging doesn’t come from freedom. It comes from power being centralized and handed out selectively. A truly free market punishes failure and rewards value. It does not protect bad actors with taxpayer money or regulatory shields. It does not give one company an advantage because it knows the right people. That distortion only exists when statism is deeply embedded in the system. So the real conversation shouldn’t be about tearing down voluntary exchange. It should be about separating markets from political power. Because once you remove the favoritism, the coercion, and the artificial protections, you start to see what people actually prefer when they’re free to choose. Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1511388920623829

The origin of money isn’t political, it’s social. It emerges from trade, not from law. Source: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1287162906725108

🫨 Source: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1864692918268544

Se existe um entardecer mais cinematográfico que o de Catas Altas, desconhecemos. 🌅 Onde o tempo desacelera e a poesia ganha cores, e o pôr do sol em Catas Altas emoldura a Igreja e a imponente Serra do Caraça, criando um cenário que parece pintado à mão. Um dos tesouros mais preciosos do Caminho dos Diamantes. ✨ Catas Altas sendo, simplesmente, inesquecível. Já sentiu essa energia de perto? Conta aqui nos comentários! 📷 FOTO: @drone.viajante 📍Catas Altas 🔒 Caminho dos Diamantes #CatasAltas #MaiorRotaTurísticaDoBrasil #caminhodosdiamantes #estradareal #institutoestradareal Source: https://web.facebook.com/reel/2033355724270126

I think my girlfriends a communist .... #jokes #dadjokes #fblifestyle Source: https://web.facebook.com/reel/1286269842866882

apreciem Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1PkpBAzuLA/

Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1258742103108484&set=pcb.1258742173108477

Pra quem vem da roça, adaptar-se à vida na cidade exige sabedoria 😅 #porco Source: https://web.facebook.com/reel/1290591133168425

Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1003691135560083

Steven Levitt é professor de economia na Universidade de Chicago. Em 2005, ele e o jornalista Stephen Dubner publicaram Freakonomics, um livro que usa dados para questionar o que achamos que sabemos sobre o mundo. Um dos exemplos mais perturbadores está no capítulo sobre parentalidade. Levitt comparou o número de crianças menores de 10 anos que morreram em piscinas residenciais com o número que morreu por conta de armas de fogo guardadas em casas. Os dados eram dos EUA, final dos anos 1990. Resultado: 550 crianças afogadas em piscinas residenciais por ano. 175 mortes por armas de fogo na mesma faixa etária. E havia 6 milhões de piscinas residenciais contra 200 milhões de armas. Fazendo as contas: uma piscina individual é 100 vezes mais perigosa para uma criança do que uma arma individual guardada em casa. A conclusão é desconcertante. Levitt conhecia pais que jamais deixariam seus filhos visitar casas com armas — mas nunca haviam pensado duas vezes sobre a piscina do vizinho. Por que isso acontece? O medo não segue a matemática do risco real. Segue a narrativa. Armas têm intenção. Piscinas, não. O familiar parece seguro. O incomum parece ameaçador. Eventos raros e dramáticos assustam mais do que riscos cotidianos silenciosos — mesmo quando esses riscos matam muito mais. Levitt chama isso de calibração errada do medo: o ser humano é sistematicamente incapaz de avaliar probabilidades de forma proporcional ao perigo real. Não é estupidez. É como o cérebro humano foi construído. E esse mecanismo explica boa parte das decisões ruins que tomamos — como consumidores, como pais, como cidadãos e como investidores. Aqui no Update Diário analisamos as melhores histórias de negócios todos os dias. Siga a gente para não perder a próxima. Fique por dentro de tudo que importa em 5 minutos. Conheça a newsletter que te entrega o resumo inteligente das notícias toda manhã em updatediario.com.br Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=945913658426007

The Most Indebted Countries in the World. Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1382943457186821

Source: https://web.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=122253344156084897&set=gm.2372848209856950