Depends if Elon can crack consciousness or if consciousness can crack Elon.

I see your cleavage and raise you a pair of leather pants.

Nice train. What makes the bitcoin map contiguous with the bitcoin territory? The analogy has to be of a kind otherwise this would be a simple Fink-esque tokenization relation and that’s just explained away as a signed abstraction layer. More interesting: in what ways is bitcoin a thing in and of itself and not just an identity token? If it’s not just the halo of first mover or network effect, what else could it be? Objectified consensus?

Metawhores

Vibe chiding

Do robots dream of cheap … electricity?

It’s just a penguin, man.

It’s a mirror dood.

Catch a rising dick?

And so are you.

How do we keep the whistleblowers safe?

Sure if you are sure you know what you mean then you’re golden. Why even speak though if you don’t need to define your terms to others?

Yeah, he’s a disinformation agent. Take the best ideas and twist them after you gain authority to the benefit of your handlers. Most celebrities prolly.

See I a, that’s an oddly innocent take. Why would you not be more suspicious? Given history and all that.

If precision is the accepted opposite of lazy, the burden of defining it rests with the accuser, ja? Without a precise definition of bad theory, the accuser may well be accused of censorship, ja?

The problem with denouncing generalizations, slapstick irony aside, is that it misses Hegel’s terrific observation that all theory is a kind of generalization. And I would claim we desperately need theory in this here Information Age when there are so many ways to mislead and misinform the masses based theories that work: poisoning the well, behavioral psychology, scaling effects, pop culture, agenda setting, NLP, captured alignment, fiat incentives …sheet.

But, ma pont. Tas ma pont.

In which ways are the generalizations you target different than your own generalization? Are you not trying to sound smart and worldly by criticizing others for trying to do the same, both using summarization and synthesis? I’m not against your critical observation but just pointing out the irony of your own genetic fallacy.

Because we’re already divided into decentralized nodes called individuals or because there is no one stronghold to defend?

Perhaps the tool is not defined by the average but taps it like syrup from a maple tree. Seeing AI as a partner is a more mentally healthy mental model than as a seer or competitor.

They have down as a NeverFBer

Yeah, so does human credulity and patience with unjust suffering.