> When AI becomes the user interface, > WhEn Ai BeCoMeS tHe UsEr InTeRfAcE,

I don't know why Bill Gates is your example, considering he isn't leading Microsoft anymore and that Apple would have been a much better example than Microsoft. That said, proprietary software developers aren't enslaving anyone, they are giving you a bad offer and it's your job to reject it. If I offer you a bad deal and you accept, that's on you. I can offer to buy your hose for 1 euro. You can (and should) reject that offer. There is at least one way proprietary software companies do "enslave" users: through education. Hence why I think education institutions, both public and private (but especially public) have a moral obligation (and should have a legal obligation) to reject proprietary software.

🇪🇺 Happy Europe Day! 🇪🇺 https://www.functorfault.net/posts/my-vision-for-europe/ #Europe #EuropeDay #EuropeDay2026 #CouncilOfEurope #CoE #EuropeanUnion #EU

Technically it's mostly based on WebSockets, which are a different protocol.

Personally I've never agreed with this. I think a contract-based moral approach makes more sensible here. Proprietary software isn't immoral if all parties accept the situation willingly. However, accepting such a contract is bad for you, the user, and bad for society if many people do, so don't. You aren't worse off than if the developer hadn't developed it at all. I think proprietary software is, however, immoral in public/governmental institutions and in education.

I don't think there is any app that prevents earthquakes.

Nostr users be like: "FrEeDoM tEcH!!!!!" Then clog Nostr with a Claude bot managed through an Apple device.

> puntacazzisti Grazie, complimento bellissimo!

"Egg" Image of a potato.

> you're fault Come on, do you even English?