spacestr

🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.

Edit
Matticus
Member since: 2022-12-20
Matticus
Matticus 16d

It's not consensus level because Knots still accepts blocks with op_returns that are arbitrarily large. If or once it stops accepting blocks with this in it, the chain will split.

Matticus
Matticus 16d

I saw this on the PayPal app. I was like yeah I want to report the bug that your app and company is a cancer.

Matticus
Matticus 16d

0.3% of Bitcoin is earning yield on-chain is not the basis for a paradigm shift. It sounds more like a crappy advertisement for some garbage defi protocol(s). So dumb.

Matticus
Matticus 16d

I'm seeing increase in X posts that are blatant appeals to authority from the usual suspects. I'm not sure why, but it's obvious that the average person (a.k.a. normies) have a lost a lot of respect and trust in so-called "experts." In a recent post, someone compared not trusting an expert to a passenger asking an airline pilot to stand aside so the passenger could fly the plane. In so doing, it reveals ignorance regarding types of information and skill. I think it's worthwhile to explain three forms of statements in order of their trustworthiness: 1. Is statement---which is information regarding the current state of reality. This is most reliable when based upon empirical observations that can be critiqued or replicated in tests. As such, these statements can often be verified and, more importantly, falsified. This is "knowledge" and is that in which a person can be an "expert." 2. Prediction---which is self explanatory, but it's an attempt to predict what is going to be or happen in the future, or what an empirical study may reveal. This is a "guess" and the value of it depends partly on the expertise (see above) of the person making it, but a better measure of its worth is the predictor's track record of making accurate prior guesses. Also, I am more inclined to trust a prediction if it's made with some equivocation, which reveals the predictor's humility and their signaling to their audience that it's merely a guess. 3. Ought statement---which is a normative claim that the person speaking wants to happen based on their subjective values or preferences. This is nothing more then an "opinion." Opinions are the weakest form of "information" because underlying almost always involves an arbitrary hierarchy of values that may or may not be consistent with the listeners subjective preferences. Put simply, a suggestion may have hidden trade offs that are not subjectively worthwhile for the intended goal. One side note; a person who applies knowledge to reality can perfect that action into a skill, which can be passed on to others who may or may not have the knowledge underlying that skill. Through practice and testing, a skill can be mastered. That's what a pilot is, for example. A pilot may know how to fly a plane but may not be able to build a plane or calculate the physics underlying the flight of a plane. That information may be helpful but not necessarily necessary. A lot of people saying "trust the experts" are often referring to ideologues in positions of authority making "ought statements," or in other words it is the opinions of a person with fancy titles. These "experts" are not always conveying knowledge or engaging in a skill, and as such, their capacity for being "correct" cannot be measured empirically. Blindly trusting them, then, is ignorant at best, and literally dangerous at worst. Although it was not my intention, this also can apply to some of the Core v. Knox debate that I have seen. I see a lot of appeals to authority on the Core side of the debate, in which Core developers or their supporters make normative claims about what something ought to be, which is fine, but when questioned resort to hand waving about it being a technical issue beyond the understanding of the uninitiated, although this may no longer be the case (I haven't kept up). Thanks for coming to my TED talk.

Matticus
Matticus 18d

Bitcoin is dead. Long live Bitcoin.

Matticus
Matticus 19d

I'm behind because I don't even know what spark is.

Matticus
Matticus 20d

Good morning, nostriches! Jesus loves you so much he died for you.

Matticus
Matticus 20d

This is just sad.

Matticus
Matticus 22d

"I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag."

Matticus
Matticus 23d

Good morning!

Matticus
Matticus 23d

102,500

Welcome to Matticus spacestr profile!

About Me

Interests

  • No interests listed.

Videos

Music

My store is coming soon!

Friends