💯

Such a great feeling when your avacados are not rotten inside! 😊🧡😁

So one initial question we may explore in our team research could be: So makes me think for the Research abstract submission we discussed at the team meeting, one possible literature scoping review question that could be examined is: What evidence exists regarding stakeholder participation (academics, clinicians, patients, and public) in the design, governance, and feature development of health and medical scientific repositories?

My key takeaways similar to yours: User-Centered Design in Academic Systems "Academics from within the discipline should be included in the design process, so that the system fits their patterns of work, and conceptual categories, rather than being imposed based on some alien categorical scheme." — James Boyle, "Mertonianism Unbound? Imagining Free, Decentralized Access to Most Cultural and Scientific Material" This principle extends beyond academics. For MedSchlr to truly serve as a knowledge commons, we must involve a range of users—including the public and the Nostr community—in co-creating features that meet their needs for accessing, understanding, and engaging with health research. Open Architecture as Innovation Engine "Wherever possible, design the system to run with open content, on open protocols, to be potentially available to the largest possible number of users, and to accept the widest possible range of experimental modifications from users who can themselves determine the development of the technology. Then sit back and wait to see what emerges." — James Boyle (citing Eric Von Hippel's work on user-based innovation) This collaborative approach—combining open access with decentralized protocols—challenges us to question the centralized architecture of existing structures and guides our development philosophy for MedSchlr.

Thanks for bringing this paper to my attention! So many key points. Boyle's paper is such a great read for thinking about how to approach a Nostr-native knowledge commons in health and medical sciences.

Thanks for listening!

The Invisible Health Tax: How Fiat Makes Us Sick? What if your constant stress, burnout, and health issues weren’t just about work, diet, or “self-care”… …but about the money system you live inside of? In this episode of The Signal, Dr Satoshi (an American hospitalist) and I sit down — to explore her new work on “The Invisible Health Tax. This conversation delves into: - How fiat money quietly creates chronic stress and sickness - The idea of a “mitochondrial tax” — the energy drain on your cells caused by unsound money - Why inflation is linked to worse mental health, lower life expectancy, and burnout - How Bitcoin’s predictable monetary policy can lower background stress and change health trajectories The role of truth, sovereignty, and alignment in healing And Emma’s new project with Dream Grad Academy, the Bitcoin Health Network — a hub connecting Bitcoin-aware health & wellness professionals with people who want sound money and sound health Along the way Dr Satoshi shares his own story of working more and more hospital shifts to keep up with fiat debasement… and how discovering Bitcoin changed my health, relationships, and sense of inner peace. If you’ve ever felt that your money and your nervous system are more connected than anyone talks about — this conversation will resonate. https://youtu.be/hjFMdk5G0j8?si=nfD5EYc1q6iis9mt