The blocking works well for me. I can see that I have already blocked many of the that respond to you; I only learn about their 'content' because you replied to them. I see your reply, but - unless I do extra clicks - I can't see the things you are responding too (I mostly use Amethyst, but this is coming from Jumble desktop)

Finally just set up voice dictation Now setting a prompt to explain to the transcriber that I'm not working with a "Chimney" protocol for moving "Cashew" around It's Whisper, locally. Also the first time I'm doing anything useful with local AI

I want an app where I can swipe left on a reply here and see a few options to block a user I block a lot when I go into replies. It's tedious to do though; should be much smoother and easier

For those that have their own (local?) hardware for llms, how easy is it for them to sell access - via routstr - to their hardware when they themselves aren't using it?

Just a moment ago on Twitter, Saifefean Ammous (The Bitcoin Standard) referred to "Keynes' moronic writings" I'm sure he'll agree it's only fair, given his choice of words, to point out that Ammous's writing are worse. I tried to read his slop, but he made the classic error of thinking that inflation brought Hitler to power and therefore I had to put his book down after reading just 20% of it https://xcancel.com/saifedean/status/2095088845230354884

Unfollowed two just now because they turned out to the generic big-blocker bots that we see so much during attacks on Bitcoin Why do so many attackers (including BIP110ers) always run out of ideas and just randomly attack Lightning and use emotional MoE arguments? Makes me more convinced that Lightning is the correct approach 🤣, and that we have the right incentives and game theory for Bitcoin We're making an asset that nobody wants to spend, and which can be transferred with private instant settlement. This is how you play the long game, making it the world's MoE

I don't want to be rude, but: Bitcoin is following the game theory that I described. That's a good thing. That's why we had to win the blocksize war Do you expect your long piece to convince me to ignore Bitcoin's incentives?

"You cannot build a monetary system by treating the money as too sacred to use" Well actually, this is the plan for bitcoin, and it's the right plan It's the most ambitious plan It's the only way for bitcoin to be the world's MoE We make an asset that nobody wants to spend and which can be transferred easily and quickly with final settlement (Lightning) If you think that contradicts the "world's MoE" goal, think about the game theory some more