.. PS: and we actually need an equivalent of BIP3, to make this more explicit

"Proof that Bitcoin has destroyed cryptography" Just one example of the fun on this great episode 🙂

I tried a Mac in college, paid for by the uni I spent all my time installing more GNU/Linux versions of all the software So eventually I just installed Linux, as MacOS way just not for me

Maybe we agree then? If the proposal is clearly written, and some non-tiny group of people want to follow this standard, then it should be in this repo. If there are a couple of implementations, and all the technical objections have been addressed, then it should be merged Merging doesn't mean that the maintainers of the repo think that the proposal is the right solution to the problem. i.e.. the same process as is used in BIPs, where the maintainers own judgement/preference/opinion is not relevant

I like how Erin pointed out how Lightning is, as it solved instant (private) settlement My journey is different from hers in many ways, but definitely I didn't have much confidence in bitcoin until after I learned the details of how Lightning channels works

Somebody needs to write the Nostr equivalent of BIP3, i.e. a write up of what the PINs/NIPs repository is for BIP-110 is a good example. It was merged into the BIPs repo some time ago and everybody understands that merging doesn't mean "approval". In the BIPs repo, merging just means that the document is making good progress towards being ready for consideration: No self-contradictions, concise, no ambiguities in places where ambiguities would be harmful, a reference implementation, and so on

PINs Proposals to Improve Nostr

A group of you needs to get together and fork the repo with a new set of maintainers The BIPs process is working well, and could be a model

STRC will cause deflation, not inflation Central banks increase interest rates (by selling Treasuries) in order to discourage the creation of credit. They do that in order to decrease inflation STRC will be seen as the de facto interest rate and therefore it will discourage credit creation So even if the US government prints money, the credit destruction in the banking sector could lead to a net decrease in the money supply

I suspect that CSS code, and frontend code in general, doesn't have much automated testing and therefore the LLMs don't have much to learn from. The browsers are very well tested, I just mean that frontend devs aren't always forced to have automated testing My LLMs got better at CSS when I stopped asking it to distinguish mobile from desktop and instead asked it to distinguish based on whether the height was greater or smaller than the width Basically, I forced myself to get involved in the layout algorithm. Then, it got much better