
When a #Bitcoin blockchain re-org happens, are the transactions in the old blocks moved into the mempool again by all the nodes, or are users expected to manually re-broadcast the transactions?
🔔 This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
EditWhen a #Bitcoin blockchain re-org happens, are the transactions in the old blocks moved into the mempool again by all the nodes, or are users expected to manually re-broadcast the transactions?
I think we all agree on that. In fact, I think that was kind of the point of this "money for enemies and idiots" "privacy for enemies and idiots" "free speech for enemies and idiots"
Thanks for your quick response People can disagree or agree with various premises, such as the question of whether jobs will still exist as AI and robots take over more economic activity But I still see no reason why Bitcoin is different from fiat *in terms of the particular things that we are discussing here*. How will the children of uneducated no-coiners be fed? Relying on the generosity of bitcoiners is no more reliable than the generosity of the fiat elite I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just hoping to find an argument based on economics that resolves this. This is too important to be dismissed as simply "being too pessimistic"; I want expert analysis and practical plans "Bitcoin will massively overhaul the financial system, which will greatly benefit hodlers, and will be good *on average* for privacy/freedom" is not the same as "Bitcoin will raise up the poorest, supporiting 8 billion with a reasonable standard of living"
> Go outside. Touch grass. Tell your loved ones about Bitcoin. I spent three months outside this summer, cycling and camping. So I've ticked that box 😃 And I do tell my loved ones about Bitcoin I'm saying this because I want you to focus on the real question, and not get distracted by questioning of my lifestyle Thanks for your long response, but unfortunately I don't think you actually provided any answer to my questions What's your mechanism for supporting 8 billion people, when - due to technology - the vast majority will have no economic value?
This might be out of date, but I found this interesting on the complexities of this https://youtu.be/MdxIkH6GCBs (I'm sure you're already more up to date on it ☺️. I'm just sharing this as I found it interesting)
Can you explain? Why is falling birth rates a problem? And what's the relevance of bitcoin? My fear is that the future will see even more extreme financial inequality, regardless of whether bitcoin is involved. From what I see, many noisy bitcoiners are not interested in reducing inequality; many are actively hostile to practical steps to minimize inequality If the world's population is large, and AI and robots take all the jobs, billions will have no economic value and will starve to death Why would a poor person today want to have children, when these terrible outcomes are very feasible
Indeed. I was skeptical of the Rosa Parks thing. And there is so much fake news from all sides, that I had to follow up a bit (no disrespect to you Jameson, but we all need to Verify - not Trust!) His Facebook comments do exist, and are as retarded as promised Reading between the lines, he's open to capital punishment for monetary transactions such as gambling. So I won't be taking any lectures from him on what is or isn't "monetary" Thanks for putting this together Jameson
I had to block a small number people in order to keep my Nostr timeline clean of most of the crap I don't like blocking, and it's good to have visibility on all sides of debates, but as an experienced Reddit troll in my youth 😜 I can tell when someone is just telling malicious lies
They should tell him that he'll be welcome with open arms ... then arrest him when he arrives
You can block whoever you want, such that you see only replies from whichever set of users you want to see If user A blocks user B, then A never sees any content from B But C can still see B's replies, even if they are replies to A. After all, why should A be allowed to interfere with the ability of C to see B's replies?
It'll be my first Bitcoin conference, so I'm trying to learn everything about Lightning ASAP 😃. I live in Berlin, so I have to grab the opportunity to attend! Great book! Lightning is very complicated, but the authors are very clear. I'm exactly half way through the book now, so to take a break I'm watching this video which covers similar topics. It's nice to see a different approach https://youtu.be/to8XItlplac
We definitely don't want a "governance" protocol. That would mean some sort of committee or "constitution" or foundation, and that would turn us into Ethereum Decentralisation means decentralisation. Get used to the resulting chaos 🙂
They don't include the Bluetooth, and so are incomplete at best
I'm not sure you know what a Sybil attack is The number of Core nodes has not increased recently, hence there is no pro-Core Sybil attack
Do you mean White Noise? I've installed it via the Zap Store, but I haven't managed to convince any of my friends to use it. It doesn't help that it's not on the Play Store yet
I'm getting a new laptop tomorrow, and I've been looking forward to doing more stuff like this, perhaps getting into more open source. So I'll be setting that up immediately when I get it (after first connecting it to my new bitcoin node, which I set up just last week) My existing laptop is a work laptop, and I'll probably just leave that as it is, without LLM assistance. But maybe I'll change my mind!
Into bitcoin. Background in maths and software, so hoping to contribute to something open source in this space When I'm not working in the fiat mines, I'm into cycling and camping I'm trying to use White Noise (different npub), but don't have many contacts yet!