Although I am concerned for shotgun kyc.

I don't disagree. 🫡 Just thinking out loud. I was wrong when I said ecash was a clear solution. It's not so clear.

Yea infra coats money. That's why I said it makes sense for primal to scale this way.

Why wouldn't a business ever run their own infra? River does for instance...

I mean the sovereign answer is that they should run their own. The only difference with this solution is integration with another corporation handling some of the backend for wallet infra. Which is how products naturally scale. So I get it. I really do. It's easier and you're trying to get a product to market. A business is not an individual. It wouldn't make sense for them to make decisions like a sovriegn individual. But where is the line? When is is good/bad/indifferent to make certain tradeoffs? Is the decision not clear for primal to have Bitcoin in self custody for their Treasury? Maybe they should have ETF instead. It's the same thought process why a business would make that decision. The solution would be for primal to have their own lightning node. And it should be proportion in size to the users they expect to serve. That's really hard at scale though. I get it.

I'm working on it.

Will do 🫡

You're not bringing anyone over to your side acting that way.

I'm sure you can still use whatever wallet you want with nwc

If you knew anything before spouting off bullshit, you would know I'm making an AMM protocol on liquid. That means using covenants that don't exist yet in Bitcoin. Why would I do that... Idk maybe so we can actually use covenants in practice, show they work and improve L1 with newly activated ones. It's a roadmap to have them on Bitcoin. I'm working day and night to build the improvements you want to see on Bitcoin itself and you're so emotionally captured that you're incapable of holding any conversation that could have been constructive to your own ends. L2s are going to exist. You can't stop them. Their existence is not automatically inherently bad for Bitcoin. Their half steps in achieving what we all want. Lightning for instance has grown adoption more than any other thing in Bitcoin I would argue and even lightning is shit and has a lot of UX problems.

ecash was the clear solution and they went with spark...

Not do they change anything about L1

And control of your funds...

What are you going off about? How TF does any of this have anything to do with staying permissionless? No one's making anyone use these protocols.

Who is my? I don't claim a protocol as my identity.

Hot take 🌶️ eCash is way more cypherpunk than spark.

Why I built my AMM on liquid...

Omg yes

This is the real signal