Natron Theory is one of the better pieces of investigative, scientific work done recently. Marcel Foti shows that natron can be used to make what is essentially “rock dough” that hardens into stone over time. This method would allow megaliths to be formed by aggregation and relieves us of the need to explain how at least some megaliths were put into place. I don’t know that it explains all megalithic sites but I bet it explains a number of them. Definitely worth checking out. I briefly mentioned Marcel Foti’s work at the end of episode 074 of the Illegitimate Scholar podcast.

Before I was suspended from X for being an “inauthentic user” (which is rather funny because I’m extremely authentic and original in my perspective), Marcel Foti (@FoMaHun) had just followed me. I have a geopolymer mini Moai statue he made. I’d bet the red granite collection basin that Geoffrey Drumm believes was a seep collection basin for a manufactured chemical was made using natron.

Yes, I briefly mentioned Marcel Foti and The Natron Theory near the end of my episode with Illegitimate Scholar.

Epsom salts were not discovered in Epsom. Epsom salts were REdiscovered in Epsom. The ancient Egyptians were manufacturing Epsom salts thousands and thousands of years before Epsom was even the name of a location on the Earth's crust. 🪶

Had some internet issues earlier. Starting a new session now live.

Starting in 4 minutes

"As the bonfires of knowledge grow brighter, the more the darkness is revealed to our startled eyes." Terence McKenna

Join us 24 hours from now as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in Ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: -the logical fallacy known as a “Loaded Question", - the 4th and 5th parts of chapter 11 from “Living the Law of One 101: The Choice”, - Session 54 of the Law of One, -personal research updates from study group members along with discussion This week we plan to cover: -the logical fallacy known as the “Middle Ground" fallacy, - the 6th part of chapter11 from “Living the Law of One 101: The Choice”, - Session 55 of the Law of One, -personal research updates from study group members along with discussion Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse: https://www.clubhouse.com/house/flight-club-aeg58h1l7sb6?chs=QKlU4Z4pWa%3A162m6aw2UBc-Y_38pxL36vmjIQ78UBQVqgi1qMuq7KQ Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session: https://www.clubhouse.com/invite/VGWIJrlel73KXX4zg987YD4KLJltlqlKkj:O8K3KYlJ_FfxeoVW0bCTgwBycWEuHrX5b0a_rvJQFXo

Someone posted this online...figured I'd share it with the Bitcoin community here and let the cyber hornets of team Nostrich sort out the truth of this claim: "Bitcoin is going to get pwned. SHA256 is not a safe hashing algorithm & can be exploited in several ways. I don't typically advertise it but here you go - https://github.com/sschepis/rust-miner - i'll leave this link up for a bit. This miner will shave about eight zeroes of difficulty off the mining process - so like one diff 1 hash every couple minutes ECDSA is a bit better, but not by much. secp256k1 will break even before quantum computers become ubiquitous. I can shave 50 bits of difficulty off a secp256k1 key on my home computer The next mining frontier is definitely going to be mining for private keys of lost assets" Your thoughts, anon?

Odds are you were born crying. What are the odds you'll die laughing?