gm, remote viewing is a thing

Join us approximately 24 hours from now (12 noon US east coast time) as we continue studying "The Law of One” which is a series of 106 conversations that occurred from 1981-1984 between a physics professor & the entity known as Ra who had previously tried to spread the Law of One in ancient Egypt with mixed results. Last week, we covered: - The logical fallacy known as “Strawman", - The opening half (pages 47-50) of chapter 5 from “A Channeling Handbook”, - Session 67 of the Law of One, - Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion This week we plan to cover: - The logical fallacy known as “Appeal to Irrelevant Authority", - The closing half (pages 51-54) of chapter 5 from “A Channeling Handbook”, - Session 68 of the Law of One, - Personal research updates from study group members along with discussion Link to join the "Flight Club" study group Clubhouse: https://www.clubhouse.com/house/flight-club-aeg58h1l7sb6?chs=QKlU4Z4pWa%3A162m6aw2UBc-Y_38pxL36vmjIQ78UBQVqgi1qMuq7KQ Link to RSVP for the upcoming study group session: https://www.clubhouse.com/invite/rgoSvZ7nBqzeevgQR0bAG3wBrKOWCnpnKyW:BQBou2k7qU7Yu2uBl83d3NWBzLgvS8O_aeVN2IAqurg

To some extent, sure. With the amount of headache and frustration non-coders experience here, we're overpaying.

Mmmmm…I’m with . I just saw you, , decide to build something for NOSTR and then work on it and do it in less than a week. That’s not how everyone is here. A lot of us barely figured out how to make this stuff work and even then, the shit changes every other week or month and then there’s all this new clunky stuff to figure out after that. It might be fine for you because you have sufficient, pertinent coding skills but many do not. I look forward to user experience that doesn’t suck.

I’ve noticed. Even the things that are well designed seem to glitch on me the first time I try them just because, apparently, everything has to be difficult.

Very nice. I don't know that I've mentioned Marcel Vogel yet in any podcast guest appearances however I'm sure I've mentioned him in my research notes and in the weekly study group sessions. I even have a Vogel crystal. I am all but certain that I have mentioned Marcel Vogel to before given the research he's doing. The late Dr. Robert Gilbert put Marcel Vogel on my radar.

If I have ever seen any IRL, it has only been at zoos. I don’t believe we saw any at the wolf preserve. They were fenced off from the visitors area but we definitely heard them howling. Your hesitance to encounter a wolf IRL is exactly why I think that Bitcoin can do a lot to reduce warfare and violence but I don’t think it’s going to totally remove the need to be able to defend ourselves against apex predators. On a long enough timeline, Bitcoin could have such a great impact that we are able to generate so much surplus food that we can feed and domesticate all alpha predators and relinquish our technological advantages to live in peace with all fauna. I just think that is probably not gonna manifest within a generation or two though. Seems like that’s probably a little bit more ambitious of a trajectory than it is a realistic one. If I see someone in a public park getting mauled by some animal, I’m gonna be happy to have a pistol with me…rabid dog attacking a 4 year old…those types of situations. Not something I ever want to have to use but it’s also not something I consider wise to go without.

If Primal is meant to be noob friendly, this screen shot illustrates a problem. Noobs do not know what a "Caching Service" is, what it does, or why we need one. The explanation is too technical. Noobs don't know what "fail over" is. If you walk up to 100 random people on the street, how many do you think are going to know what "fail over" means in the precise way that this "help" thing is using the terms? Noobs are not aware of lists of other "Caching Services". Noobs do not have a preference as to whether we should only leave one entry in the pool. Start9 did this on one of their steps...I'm sitting there reading the little if-then choice they left in their steps and I'm thinking to myself "But I don't know enough to even have an opinion on this choice they're telling me I have to make. What about people like me?" Please don't ever assume we know enough to make decisions about this kind of thing if you want Primal to be noob friendly. Also, as a sanity check for us noobs who are never sure if our stuff is messed up or if it's your side that's messed up, could there be a section in Primal where y'all post all the stuff that you are presently aware of that is messed up that people are bitching about? If I notice that the likes and reposts aren't working, it would be nice to be able to go to the "Known Issues Currently Affecting Users" section and see for myself "Oh...shit...look at that...it's not just me experiencing this issue" or, alternatively "Oh, damn...I'm the only one? Either I'm the first one to notice it which is unlikely or something's messed up on my end." That alone would be very valuable for those of us who are struggling to use this protocol because we haven't spent the last 20 years learning to code in an economy that requires much more than just coders.

If you come to St. Louis and take I-44 west a ways out past the suburbs and whatnot there is a wolf preserve. I've gone there before, at night. We heard the wolves howling so we went outside and howled back. The wolves stopped. We assume that our howls were so atrociously bad that the wolves were like "Naw, dude. Fuck that. I ain't yellin 'Polo' to those idiots! Did you hear those howls? Nope. They're gonna get our whole pack killed if they find us."

I've stopped caring about trying to orange pill people I've already approached about it. I'll still bring it up for the first time with new people but at this point, I'm really happy that closed minded, intellectually lazy people are suffering as a result of their closed minded, intellectually lazy decisions. Pain is the best teacher. This will help them grow.

I can't speak from experience per se, but it seems like theoretically the rate at which you experience these moments will reduce asymptotically towards 0 over the course of the rest of your life. Ebbinghaus's forgetting curve suggests this.

It's probably good that you use a pseudonym because I'm certain that some gay men can figure out how to find the Bitcoin meetups you attend and explain to you the benefits of well thought out vocabulary choices and precise speech.

Bitcoin video rodeo challenge: I lasted 48 seconds before I got bucked off of this bullshit. https://youtu.be/DTA4atyDKS8

Why do you care so much about people who have shat on your perspective for 12 years?

Presumably this is AI generated, in which case, I like how they chose to use Senator Pocahontas as the model.

You know how dumb no-coiners look when they insist they know better than you but they’ve only studied the fiat currency they were born into? You talk circles around them, right? You talk about the Rai stones. You talk about gold and silver. You talk about glass beads and wampum. You talk about paper. You talk about shitcoins. You talk about Bitcoin. They sit there feeling completely outclassed. People don’t like that, especially in a public setting with witnesses. So, what often happens is the person who feels outclassed masquerades as though they are not outclassed. They don’t want to feel like they “can’t hang” in the conversation but since they cannot refute any of your talking points and have little of substance to say, instead they engage in attempts to rugpull the value of all of your due diligence with a fun tactic called “invincible ignorance”. Invincible ignorance is a tactic in which they stubbornly refuse to do their due diligence on the same subjects on the grounds that to do so would be a waste of time. While that may or may not be true, they cannot HONESTLY render that judgment as they have not done the due diligence. You can’t know in advance that studying something is going to be a waste of time. There is a sunken cost to every instance of education. It is what it is. You can’t justify walking past a closed door by ignorantly asserting that there is nothing of value behind it. Even a 4 year old can understand this logic. Now…apply this same logic to religion. If you’ve only studied the tradition into which you were born, or maybe you’ve studied two because you’re a convert, you’re not different from the arrogant no-coiner banging the Keynesian fiat drum. Acting like you have a sound grasp on cosmology, ethics, and history when you’ve only got one or two traditions under your belt is charlatanism, arrogant, and frankly, participation in a Ponzi scheme of false validation. Each tradition offers testimony to the truth. Each witnesses testimony may be more or less distorted. It may contain more or less irrelevant baggage. Nonetheless each witness is a witness for some reason. They have SOMEthing useful to contribute. The one or two trick ponies lack proof of work and are noise obfuscating signal. 🪶

You see what they found down the Osiris shaft by Giza? 😎 If not, see email. Herodotus wasn't full of shit, and Tarot Card 20 may not have had as much of an occult blind as I thought. I still think it has one, but it's only half of what I thought it was...the lake around the sarcophagus is real. The fit is dovetail joint echelon.

https://medium.com/@redtailhawk1923/how-a-synthetic-cyberpandemic-will-clear-the-path-for-central-bank-digital-currencies-604be3055825