I am not going to be friendly (ever) with any simpfluencer who has been calling out NVGhey and his compromised devices as a damage control but hasn't called out any anti BIP110 clowns YET. These simpfluencers need to be completely WIPED OUT from the bitcoin space otherwise bitcoin will never recover from the monetary perspective and protecting the social layer of bitcoin perspective. I will continue to REITERATE that if plebs don't become SUPER RADICAL and SUPER HOSTILE TO THESE FAKE AND GHEY SIMPFLUENCERS/VCs/DEVs, BITCOIN IS GOING TO FAIL FROM MONETARY PERSPECTIVE.

My fellow plebs : - If any of the plebs is anti BIP110 and if that person has been either completely lost the fund from their Coldcard hww because of Coldcard vulnerability or about to lose his fund from his Coldcard hww because he is miles away from his hww, please DON'T MAKE FUN OF HIM OR DON'T ATTACK HIM BY SAYING CORETARD/MIDWIT. This is not the time to attack plebs who are on the opposite side of the monetary maximalism. You don't want anyone to get rugged like this not even your worst enemy. This sounds retarded but I don't care.

Joe gives me a lot of faggy vibes. I am glad that he blocked me a while ago on X.

UNPOPULAR OPINION: - BIP110 has way more consensus from plebs than taproot (aka gayroot). Taproot was an attack to ACCELERATE node centralization. ABOLISH THE TAPROOT

Exactly this is what BIP110 will be doing upon SUCCESSFUL activation of BIP110. Unless you are saying this from OLARP or NVGhey (or any other controller opposition) perspective which is just PSYOP so they can keep gaslighting you.

should immediately RESIGN from the following things since he proved how he is as miserable & incompetent as his butt buddy NVGhey. 1> 2> 3> From saying "StAy HuMbLe & StAcK sAtS" 4> PrIvAcY AdVoCaTe (aka Privacy Larper) If resignation from following things doesn't HUMBLE him then plebs need to be more toxic to make sure he rage quit the bitcoin entirely.

UNPOPULAR OPINION: - Bitcoin was already changed fundamentally (before blowing out op_return limit) when shitcoin core devs CHANGED THE DOCUMENTATION to RATIONALIZE inscription bug instead of FIXING it. They officially signalled everyone at that point that bitcoin is not just for money but for (INEFFICIENT) DATA STORAGE as well.

Unpopular Opinion: - could be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick. Shitcoin core could be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick Andy Pedo could be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick Funding Organizations like and could also be just a puppet of Tether / Lutnick. The final boss is Tether / Lutnick who actually want to CAPTURE bitcoin. BUCKLE UP because this shit is going to get wild.

This is the only criticism of BIP110 I would agree with...!!! Any future softforks after successful activation of BIP110 need to be MORE RADICAL NOT LESS otherwise bitcoin may never be able to hold its monetary property properly. Following are some of the radical ideas (but very practical) about softforks (obviously from my 80IQ perspective) 1> Reduce the blocksize (~300 kb) 2>Remove witness discount 3> Completely get rid of taproot (aka gayroot) (at best) or fix the taproot (at worst) cc , , Dr Jack Kruse

I will start unfollowing all those NPC bitcoiners who will still defend following clowns despite of doing significant damage to the self custody ethos of the bitcoin. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7)

It needs to go even lower...!!!

You are asking this question to wrong person because OLARP is midwit at best and zionist/coretard at worst otherwise he wouldn't be talking shit about BIP110.

If you still don't think BIP110 is the make or break moment for bitcoin then sorry but you are NPC/midwit bitcoiner.

(aka OLARP) would never share this post even if this is a high signal post. I am aware that Nostr is an open protocol but the clowns like OLARP would be major contributor behind the FAILURE of Nostr.

Unpopular Opinion: - did more damage to bitcoin than the and David Bailey & Co. combined. I don't know if bitcoin recovers from this for at least next 10 years. New bitcoiners will never feel safe doing self custody especially if they intend to do single-sig. I don't even know what I should tell to my friends and family anymore when it comes to doing self custody of their bitcoin. I NEVER HATED BITCOIN LIKE THIS SINCE I BECAME BITCOINER.

This response from tells you at least 3 things: - 1) BIP110 doesn't break anything except some EXTREME UsE cAsEs for fake and ghey DevElOpErS. 2)BIP110 is extremely moderate softfork. 3)We need more RADICAL softforks to increase the moneyness of the bitcoin such as reducing the blocksize, scrapping witness discount & taproot (aka Gayroot), scrapping the op_return completely. All in all, BIP110 exposed a lot of controlled opposition like Andy pedo, , , and last but not least . Once plebs start supporting more radical softforks, you will see controlled opposition like Giacomo showing their true colors at some point. Our end goal should be to neutralize Giacomo's boss which is Tether and I am fairly confident that the more radical we become for monetary maximalism, the more we will be able to expose FAKE AND GHEY BiTcOiN MaXiMaLiStS.