Trezor Safe 7 So… quantum tech isn’t even real-world ready, yet Trezor Safe 7 claims it’s quantum-resistant? I tried to stay quiet, but this dark marketing is unbearable. Heartbreaking to see so-called Bitcoiners pushing this massive lie. First: huge props to Tropic Square 01 – the first fully open-source secure element in hardware. But now comes the deceptive hype. Trezor Safe 7 boasts Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) – supposedly AES-256 encrypted, mutual auth, secure pairing. Yet BLE runs on 2.4 GHz shared with Wi-Fi, microwaves, everything. Remember KNOB? Forces key downgrade to 1 byte, cracked offline in seconds. Or BIAS in ECC that breaks the signature curve. These are Bluetooth protocol flaws – BR/EDR and BLE – hitting any compliant device: phones, laptops, tablets… and now hardware wallets like Safe 7. I’ve got a full video on daily Bluetooth attacks. But the real lie is quantum-proof. With what curve? PQC like Kyber has zero real-world consensus. Even if it did, you’d need post-quantum keys generated in a side-channel-resistant environment – Trezor uses generic chips with no physical shielding, wide open to fault injection & power analysis. Google Willow is 10^25 x faster at factorization – RSA-2048 dead in a blink. What algorithm proves their resistance? NIST hasn’t finalized PQC, and even if they used it, their chip has zero side-channel protection: attacker with an oscilloscope reads power traces, guesses the nonce, breaks ECDSA. Easy? No. Impossible? No. No true air-gap + pure PSBT = open bridge to the net – app malware, BLE MITM, seed exposed. Want real quantum-proof? Start with true offline: → Coldcard → SeedSigner → Offline phone + BlueWallet Study Bitcoin 📚
