It is a great day for Nostr and therefore the world, has pushed CLINK integration I wrote up a quick guide on attaching your nostr offer and nostr debit https://stacker.news/items/1235448/r/justin_shocknet?commentId=1235570

But [they] are *supportive* of at least CTV

It's just the tail growing back

If you support covenants, you're not a bitcoiner, but a shitcoiner that wants Bitcoin to look like ethereum. Covenants enable one thing, delegation to centralized apps, centralized apps that can only be used to mis-represent themselves as Bitcoin, generate swap-fees, and conduct surveillance through coordination services and aforementioned swaps. Sure, these things happen now, but if they are succesful in getting their shitfork activated it'll lend them undue credibility with unsophisticated users that will be hurt. Bitcoin becoming more like ethereum has no upside, it's just high time preference degenerate behavior that creates systemic risks should any of these Fake L2's grow in size. It's now these fake, surveillance prone, dark-funded subchains that are directing development priorities among both Core and Knots... a true tragedy of the commons unlike Bitcoin has ever seen. Jimmy good, more people should think critically like Jimmy.

No res on X, but I hope he'll acknowledge this in a manner consistent with his concerns about Bitcoin's ethereumification.

What's comical is you can't see past the fake fight. Sheep to the slaughter. Doesn't matter if sammiches like Luke or not, they're on the SAME TEAM., the take money from Fake-L2 team. Fake L2's want CTV because filters won't matter at all if they get it. Fake L2's are what fund active development, because they have a monetization model, swap fees. Both Knots and Core want Bitcoin poisoned, it'll look like this unless active development is rejected wholesale.

I wrote off Guida as a serious person after his flailing virtue-signaling defense of Bolt12 I'll reel you in on covenants disrespect eventually, but hopefully not after the damage has been done.

Luke himself had CTV on his roadmap post the other day. The fight is fake, Core vs. Knots is a psyop for Jack's money vs. Jack's money. Swap-fee based fake-L2's are driving development priorities in both cases. Active development is cover for activist development.

As long as Knots supports covenants they're just as guilty... ... but the meme is excellent.

Wouldn't there be a race at the last step? Unless there's another secret the user implicitly has in a step im missing, then settling the invoice to reveal the sellers secret is going to be slower than the the seller can use it to broadcast the paramount back to themselves If it's locked to their key then what's the failure recovery scenario for the seller?