Core is negotiating with the terrorists. They are saying: let's give the spammers op_return, so they don't bloat the utxo set. Bip110 is saying: gfy, we will defend both (and patch other exploit vectors), go spam somewhere else. This is my simplified understanding.

No proof of shorts on the picture.

Bip110 is not only about the op_return. And the idea of op_return limit lifting to mitigate utxo bloat is controversial to say the least.

Nostr should always be attractive for the 1% who care about permissionlessness and censorship resistance. CEOs are needed to build things that will attract other potential users.

POW! In sunny, but frosty Warsaw ☀️❄️ the shadowy bitcoin superwalkers 🥷🏻🦶🏻 strike again 👊🏻💥 FTW 😁 bitcoinwalk.org/warszawa #proofofwalk #everySat

I apologize for the tone. The invitation stands 🫂

Thank you for your kind advice! You are invited to join the walks. It's just that it's a controversy if bitcoin is broke or not, and if it needs fixing or not. I understand that you might have a different opinion than me. I will generously let you have it. In turn please allow me to choose how I use my time. Deal?

Too late.

Holy crap, I'm afraid to watch it 🤭

This entire album https://wavlake.com/album/257a5d0f-bb0f-48a0-8875-5a2624c955a6

that was quick

I have a solution for this. I don't make tpyos.

LFW!

Meaning of words changes, the language evolves, as long as it's used. Pleb in bitcoin is a humble person with an immutable voice in the network. This network is different than the state, because it empowers its particiopants instead of enslaving them. Sovereign individuals participating in bitcoin network decided to call themselves plebs and noone can stop them, even the darkest of dark lords.

He did the unimaginable again. One more youngster to beat. Wow. He is a true gigachad. Whatever happens, he will remain the GOAT, but if he wins the AO again, in this circumstances, with this history... Freedom fighters FTW!

Tomorrow we're expecting sunny weather during the Warsaw. Come and enjoy it with us 😎

The damage example from the top of my head is the increasing cost of running a node, which is a centralising force. Additionally, the utxo bloat is a mining centralising force. Centralisation makes the network more vulnerable. The original post is more philosophical than technical, but in my opinion, in case of bitcoin serving as money, the tech should follow the original idea, not the other way round. If we don't defend it and optimise the tech to serve the original purpose, we will lose it.