Jeff, did you see this message? Really curious if you think this interpretation is correct.

Can you tell me if this is the correct way to look at it: - government is not efficient - if we can build without government interference (free market) - eventually it will lead to abundance - people in this new system will share the abundance since there is enough anyway (will never happen in current system) - in the shift to the new system people without bitcoin, AI/robotics and/or added value will be fucked until the shift is complete

Jeff did not seem to answer your question on the consequences for people losing their job to AI. He circles around it that if everything gets cheaper you need less or nothing. That maybe true if you have enough bitcoin already but there are only few who do. And if the few control the AI/robots and your labor does not earn you bitcoin anymore you watch the prices go down in bitcoin terms for others but you are still screwed if output does not get shared. Plz let me know what I am missing....