The last conspiracy theory is that all heads of state of countries that play a significant role on the World's stage (yes, even opposing countries) are on the same team and have been on the same team for much longer than you've been alive. Imagine a World in which the same ~people~ control the USA, Russia, China, Israel, Iran, Germany, Japan, the UK, etc. Over time, the politicians you see on TV change, but the real decision makers never change. You always need to give people an illusion of choice, an illusion of having an alternative, otherwise they might revolt. If you don't like the US, you can move to Russia, China, Japan or any other country. Now, there are a lot of differences between these countries. - But somehow they've all decided to enslave their people with fiat, which inevitably turns any country into Weimar Germany over time. But these leaders love their countries, right? Most of them have kids, so why would they not try to course correct? - Somehow all of these opposing countries managed to have the same Coronavirus scamdemic response and not one World leader blew the whistle that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate. - Somehow 58 parties signed the Antarctic Treaty in 1959, including the Soviet Union. Yes, this happened during the Cold War. - Somehow all of the heads of state of these countries pretend that nuclear weapons exist, even though there is 0 evidence that they do. - In his book "The Great Taking", David Webb exposed that in every country in the World you don't really own the stocks in any of your accounts - the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) does. They directly own of all of your stocks, bonds, digitized securities, mortgages, etc. In short, if the financial system fails, your assets will be used as collateral as you are an u creditor. This is somehow the law in every country in the World. On a smaller scale, you see that politicians never threaten the system, e.g. Democrats vs Republicans pretend to hate each other but both ultimately follow the script to a t. I've theorized why this is likely the case on a larger scale (between countries) in the post below.

Unfortunately, I have to agree with Andrew Yang here. Basically every UBI enthusiast ever: "The people gave governments too much power, so governments robbed them of their time, money and productivity growth with inflation and taxation. We need to give total control to governments, so they can fix the issue." They always appeal to emotion: "What are the people going to do when AI takes their jobs? The government has to save them with magic money (that will be used against them).". Is there an alternative that doesn't involve giving governments total control? (Bitcoin as money -> Productivity growth -> deflation -> everything drops to the marginal cost of production over time - as Jeff Booth has talked about) These UBI enthusiasts never address what happens after everyone starts receiving conditional, magic, programmable money and practically giving governments more power than they've ever had in an age of the most advanced technology we've ever had. The technocrats (Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, etc) are presented as an alternative to big government, and they are - a much worse, more competent and more difficult to avoid form of government. The idea that you can give everyone money and everyone will be able to afford food, shelter, bills, etc is just a fairy tale. What I think will happen is that these UBI slaves will have a very low quality of life, whereas Bitcoiners will have a high quality of life. The system will vilify Bitcoiners, presenting them as evil, greedy speculators who have destroyed currencies to enrich themselves with Bitcoin. Companies like MicroStrategy will be nationalized to "improve" the quality of life of UBI slaves (but really to strengthen failing currencies). Don't you want to help your fellow citizens, mr Bitcoiner? We'll convert your MSTR shares to magic UBI money that you can spend on soy burgers and fluoride supplements. Maybe we can have a referendum and have the UBI slaves vote on whether we should steal the Bitcoin from your Bitcoin stocks. Don't you like Democracy? Maybe we can have a referendum on making Bitcoin illegal and forcing all holders to sell their Bitcoin to the government for magic UBI money to strengthen the currency. You don't like Democracy? Why are you such a communist? The solution of course is self-custody Bitcoin and not being a bitch. The people at the top, with access to the money printers are unfortunately not stupid. They are going to explode the Bitcoin price (in fiat terms) in a very short period of time and then they'll paint Bitcoiners as evil speculators.

"Sadness is caused by intelligence. The more you understand certain things, the more you wish you didn't understand them." - Charles Bukowski If you are so smart, would you try to dumb yourself down to improve your quality of life? Are you really so smart when you haven't figured out arguably the most important thing - how to live a happy life? It seems to me that understanding certain things that other people don't understand or care to understand can make you feel alone. And I don't mean alone as in not having people around you, you can have plenty of people around you and still feel alone. It also doesn't seem like you need to be that intelligent to understand most things in this day and age, you just need to study logical fallacies and be a critical thinker. It's easy to fall into the trap of "Oh, I'm so smart and that's why I'm depressed, the problem is with everyone else. I guess I'll just have to wait for everyone else to improve to be happy." But are you though? Or are you just too comfortable being sad and lazy 🤔

Most scientists hate this graphic because it reminds them that they've spent their entire careers lying to their people for fake money on behalf of governments. That's why you have to "trust the science" or to be more precise "trust the scientism priests" because if you try to verify their claims, you might have to unlearn almost everything you've ever learned.

The comments on anything Flat Earth are always amusing. This topic triggers people like no other topic. You tell someone that we don't know where the fuck we are and they get so mad. "But bro, the lights in the sky are spheres, therefore the Earth is a sphere." Let's assume that the lights in the sky are physical and are spheres, and this is just an assumption as there is no evidence, imagine that you are in a giant warehouse and look up and you see a spherical light bulb, does that prove that the floor is also a sphere? "A pool table has balls on it, therefore the pool table is also shaped like a sphere." Then you have people who have not spent 2 hours doing research discovering that waves, atmospheric conditions, precipitation, mountains and valleys exist. "But bro, if the world is flat, I should be able to see from Madrid to New York. It should be glass-flat and you should be able to see forever. Fog doesn't exist." Then they tell you: "Well at least we have a model, you don't even have a model. How does X work on a Flat Earth?" Most of them just don't get that falsification is independent of replacement. I don't have to prove how everything works on a flat plain to disprove that the Earth is a spinning ball of the alleged size. The default position is flat and stationary as you cannot observe curvature or movement and you see the sky moving, not the ground. You have the burden of proof to prove that it's a spinning ball of the alleged size without falling for logical fallacies and this hasn't been done yet. You can start asking questions, such as "How did all these seemingly competing countries all agree on The Antarctic Treaty?", or you can be a foot soldier for the establishment. The only other things they seem to agree on are the Coronavirus plandemic response and the fiat scam. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdzBv6hD8_Q

Today's science: 1. You have numbers a, b and c that you have no way of verifying. 2. You do some perfectly valid math with your magic numbers. 3. You make conclusions that take for granted that a, b and c are what is assumed. This of course is perfectly fine if you make it clear that your conclusion is only valid IF a, b and c match your assumptions, however, today's scientists aren't allowed to question the official narrative, so they present their houses of cards as facts. If you question them, they tell you: "But the math matches". In other words, 1 Unicorn + 1 Unicorn = 2 Unicorns, math checks out, therefore Unicorns exist. Then other "scientists" use your house of cards conclusions and built on that. Most people want answers, they don't want a nuanced, objective discussion and the "scientists" are funded very well to give the people the answers that best serve the establishment.

It's interesting that the American people are slowly getting ready to fall for it again with Thomas Massie in the same way they fell for Donald Trump, but this time Trump is the bad guy. Elon Musk is also being prepped as an alternative as Trump was already elected 2 times, so you have to think long term. "Whenever the people need a hero we shall supply him." - Albert Pike However, notice that all of these 'heroes' only address the symptoms and not the disease. All of these propped up alternatives only offer a limited hangout and don't threaten the system. You would never hear any of them speak about how: - there's no evidence that viruses exist and vaccines are used to depopulate. - there's no evidence that nuclear weapons exist. - the official narrative for the Antarctic treaty is a total lie and the Controllers are likely hiding more land. - you can't vote yourself out of slavery. - the system is only afraid of a tax revolt and total rejection of fiat slavery (in favor of Bitcoin), it doesn't care about you breaking windows and protesting on the streets. - a spinning ball Earth of the alleged size has been falsified, so you don't even know where you live. As a politician, you can't fix the system from within the system, so the only meaningful thing you can do is expose the system and unplug as many people as you can from the Matrix and obviously none of the politicians have attempted to do so.