Exactly, and in addition every second word is spelled wrong 😂 Stew should take this man's phone away or at least tell him to stay off twitter.

Also, forgot to mention this is a tweet by Carlos Cortez - the guy who gives financial advice on Stew's show. He may or may not be retarded. You need to have some real hatred for your followers to have hired this guy to give them financial advice. This is the original tweet: https://x.com/CarlosCortezJr3/status/1931925317507015131

Yeah mate, I don't either, but the only reason you'd want to create a shitcoin is to scam your followers. And I mean the poorer, lower IQ, more desperate portion of his followers as those are the people who generally fall for these scams. The notion of a noble shitcoin is laughable as he tried to present his. If you love your people you would never want to have total control over them with a shit coin, you'd just educate them on Bitcoin. As you said, snakes are everywhere, can't trust anyone.

Yes, agreed, it's crazy to me how people like Dave, Stew Peters, etc create shit coins. I am going to assume that they are both millionaires and very well off, so it doesn't make sense to me. I guess it could be that you can never have too much money or someone blackmailed them into doing it. And as you said, you could easily discredit the person and all of their work, even though it's unrelated, with a shitcoin scam.

So the US introduced the income tax in 1913 (with the creation of the FED) but they had built many State Capitol buildings in the 1700-1800s. Many of these Capitol buildings look like palaces. Assuming that the official narrative is true, how did they get the money to build these capitol buildings 🤔 I guess governments were very frugal and efficient back then. It is also possible that these buildings were already there from a previous civilization, but when I look at what we're building today, with the most advanced technology ever, these old buildings pale in comparison to today's magnificent boxes. Montgomery, Alabama - 1851 Sacramento, California - 1874 Denver, Colorado - 1901 Hartford, Connecticut - 1879 Washington, DC - 1829 Atlanta, Georgia - 1889 Des Moines, Iowa - 1886 Here are some other examples: https://www.businessinsider.com/capitol-building-every-state-photos

I didn't know Dave had a shitcoin 😂, he is jewish after all. I don't know much about him but he seems like a nice guy and often does presentations to channels with 100 subs, so I'm guessing he's passionate about this kind of stuff.

Yes, and also Bruce Maguire has the best deep dive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ

If you're intellectually honest and interested, check out: BTW, I am also a React.js, TS and Next.js developer 😃 1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDgtS6qa5hY 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvjSC_Zo77s

Many points there, in regards to "We've known about the sphericity of the Earth since Eratosthenes' intelligent experiments 2200 years ago.", I don't know who "We" is in this statement but all ancient Civilizations, religions and races believed in flat earth. Spinning ball Earth is a recent phenomenon. If you are intellectually honest and interested on the topic, check out: 1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDgtS6qa5hY 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvjSC_Zo77s "The formulas we use to determine the coverage of radio stations work perfectly, and are based on (among other things) the sphericity of the Earth. If the Earth were flat, FM stations from Tasmania could be heard routinely and clearly in the Hollywood hills." 1 Unicorn + 1 Unicorn = 2 Unicorns, the math checks out, therefore Unicorns are real. Meanwhile, you can shoot lasers much further than you should be able to (assuming a globe of said proportions), and you can see much further than you should be able to (assuming a globe of said proportions). This of course does not prove flat earth, it could still be a globe, just 100 times bigger in diameter than advertised. Here is just one example of hundreds, you can buy a Nikon camera, go to one of these places and test for yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdzBv6hD8_Q

It's very interesting how people don't get mad when you tell them that birds don't exist or that cars aren't real. However, they very often get mad when you ask them to prove that the Earth is a spinning ball, viruses exist and nuclear weapons exist (the atom has been split), etc. Birds clearly exist. You can watch birds, feed them, you can even maybe own one. Cars obviously exist as you can own one and drive it. However, how would you prove that the Earth is a spinning ball, the atom has been split, and viruses exist? Usually people try to with endless appeals to authority/popularity, shifting the burden of proof, or other fallacies. - "Well, here is a picture of Earth taken by NASA - clearly it is a spinning ball". Even though these images have been admitted by the artists who created them to be CGI composites, often cloud patterns are reused, small countries seem to be larger than continents, etc. - "Well, the United States used nuclear weapons in Japan on the 6th and 9th of August 1945 in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, therefore the atom has been split. It is impossible that they just dropped large bombs, they had to have dropped atomic bombs because the news said so." - "Well two people who live together got sick at the same time, so viruses exist, even though one has never been isolated". And the more questions you ask them, their subconscious recognizes that all they have is appeals to authority, aka blind faith. This is when most people experience cognitive dissonance. Cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort experienced when a person holds two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes simultaneously. This discomfort often motivates individuals to change their beliefs or behaviors to achieve consistency and reduce the unease. And as Mark Twain said "It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled". What percentage of the population has the mental strength to admit that they've been fooled? In my experience, the number is very low. Most people just reply with "Well, why would they lie?" (appeal to motive) or "Well, you aren't an expert, so you don't know what you're talking about" (appeal to authority). - In other words, "If you are unsure that God exists, go to a Seminary school or a Church and the Priests will tell you all about him". At least the subconscious of these people works very well. They recognize that all they have is blind faith, which makes them mad as you proceed to ask them questions they don't know the answer to, but they just don't have the mental fortitude to go one step further and examine the evidence objectively. Subconsciously they know the evidence could lead them somewhere they aren't willing to go.

I did not intend to attack the importance of your profession. What I meant was that Globe math might work (based on assumptions and post-dictions) and this still doesn't prove that the Globe model is the correct model. I am not a broadcast engineer and don't know much about the implementation but I am going to take a guess that radio stations would also work on a Flat Earth. Do you think that engineers who build 50-100 mile long bridges take into account the Earth's curvature? Because they don't. Do you think that airplane pilots take into account the Earth's curvature when they fly/land? Because they don't. Do you think that snipers take into account the Earth's spin when they shoot? Because they don't. It is also very interesting that military equations assume a "stationary, flat, non-rotating Earth". https://fevids.com/2022/05/09/44-government-documents-prove-flat-earth/ I only spoke of what ancient people believe because you said we knew of the Earth's sphericity for 2200 years. Obviously what anyone believes doesn't prove one way or another. Also, what you said "If the Earth were flat, FM stations from Tasmania could be heard routinely and clearly in the Hollywood hills." is not true because mountains and valleys exist and the distance from Tasmania to LA is ~8000 miles. You can still watch the videos I sent you in the previous post though. I don't know for sure whether the Earth is a globe or flat, and let's not fall for false binaries because it's shape could be something else entirely. However, I am almost certain that the Earth is not a sphere of said proportions.