Is Bitcoin Core gay or straight? 🤔 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5a7QjY4XKA

David Rogers Webb made 2 documentaries because most people won't read the book (and don't have to): 1) https://odysee.com/@EarthNewspaper:e/The-Great-Taking-by-David-Rodgers-Webb:3 2) https://rumble.com/v6qy8lo-stop-it-the-great-taking-documentary.html

When I first figured out that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate, I wanted to tell everyone and their mother. Some people are open-minded and want to objectively investigate the evidence for themselves. Them you can try and help. On the other hand, most people effectively turn into Mr Smith (a defender of the genocidal state) and attack you. At first, I tried to help them figure things out, but eventually, I stopped trying. As Mark Twain said: "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled." This is more of an issue when it comes to people in your life (friends/family). Some of your friends/family are probably capable of using logic and the rest are probably the average NPC. What works best for convincing the second group is - pain and suffering, or if you're a winner. If you're a winner and things just work for you, people tend to listen even if you come at them with "crazy conspiracy theories".

Even with all the implicit and explicit yield curve control, bond yields are slowly rising. I am of the opinion that the Controllers can prolong the fiat ponzi for much longer than most think, but will eventually decide to rug. Why? Because all fiat currencies eventually fail, and the Controllers will definitely decide to fail the current financial system in a carefully preplanned fashion to avoid excess chaos. If markets were efficient, bond yields would be in the double digits (and then most would realize that with current debt levels this is game over). However, markets are efficient to constraints. Most of the bond holders in the system are captive - meaning they are aware that it is a mathematical certainty they will get robbed if they buy bonds, but they are forced to. So bond yields are fake and managed, just like the prices of most, if not all, assets. Yield Curve Control (YCC) = Central Bank commits to cap yields on some part of the curve (say 10Y at 4.25%). If yields try to rise above the cap, Central Bank buys bonds in unlimited size to enforce the level. It's a way to say: "Beyond this point, the bond market no longer gets to vote on our fiscal/monetary mix." Yield Curve Control is the bridge that lets the Controllers carry an insane nominal debt pile through inflation surges, regime shifts, and crises, without allowing yields to reflexively spike and force default. With YCC, the curve is no longer a sensor; it's a policy-controlled output. You often hear about explicit YCC (Japan style), but the whole fake fiat system is designed around implicit YCC. The logical question is: - "Who are these rich retards who keep buying bonds and keep getting robbed just so they can fund their own enslavement?" Most people/companies who have lots of money usually know that owning bonds is a losing proposition, so you have to force them to buy your useless paper. States design the rules so that banks, insurers, pensions, and autopilot funds end up long bonds, and then bonds get expropriated in real terms. This is the path of least resistance. Retail with direct bonds is rounding error. So the bondholders are the institutional skeleton that anchors the regime: states, banks, pensions, insurers, big funds, and foreign sovereigns. Why them? Because they are controllable, slow, diffuse, and essential. They can't easily run, can't easily revolt, and can be quietly sheared to fund whatever comes next (AI governance).

Precisely. Guys like him should stop and ask themselves: "How has 'serving your country' worked out for your country?" Considering it is now run by pedophiles, probably not great.

Perhaps, the most important question of our time: - What would have to happen for a few dozen people to enslave a few billion people? A very compressed TL;DR The hardest truth is that a few dozen people do not enslave billions by being superhuman. They do it by sitting above systems that most people cannot see, cannot exit, and cannot coordinate against. The public usually imagines slavery as maximal visible brutality. But the more durable form is: - administratively soft, - technologically deep, - financially integrated, - morally justified, - narratively fragmented, - and psychologically internalized. In that form, many slaves call themselves free because they can still choose entertainment, careers, identities, purchases, opinions, and aesthetic tribes inside the cage. That is the real danger. So, for a few dozen people to effectively enslave a few billion people, they would need: - monopoly on force as backstop, - dominance over money and payments, - universal identity and legibility, - integrated surveillance and behavioral telemetry, - control over media, prestige, and the language of legitimacy, - the ability to punish through exclusion rather than visible violence, - destruction of horizontal trust and local autonomy, - a dependent "middle class", not a starving mass, - fusion of state, corporate, legal, media, and financial power, - a population fragmented into isolated individuals and reactive tribes, - permanent crisis to justify centralization, - and a permissioned lifeworld where survival, mobility, work, savings, and speech all depend on system-compatible access. That is how a few dozen could rule billions. Not by owning every mind. By owning the rails that decide what happens to people who do not comply.

I try to be a freedom maxi. Whatever gives you the most freedom is what you should use. I've covered what made me fall out of love with Bitcoin in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ). TL;DR - no privacy by default, DEI developers who've been attacking its sovereign/MoE use, L2s seem like a failed project at least from the mass, non-custodial use viewpoint, etc. The community having to coordinate to defend Bitcoin from attackers all of the time (the Coordination tax I've written about) is why I think we'll be stuck in infinite "Bitcoin wars": - Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs "art" (ongoing) - Taint, "clean UTXOs" & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin - Node liability & "publisher" / CSAM / sanctions content - Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & "lost coins" - Paperization & "wrapped Bitcoin" vs base-layer Bitcoin - Protocol ossification vs "surgery to survive" - Blockspace & "digital cash vs data chain" (the rematch) The Core v30 fiasco and how many people updated their node software by default, was a big wake up call for me. If I immerse myself in all of this garbage, I'll probably start aging in dog years.

The US-Israel war with Iran brings us closer to the Great Reset https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings

Most people will do whatever they think is in their short-term interest. It's that simple. Which is why the corrupt media and influencers romanticize war and "serving your country" so much. The only way this changes is if becoming a mercenary for the government becomes expensive and looked down upon.

Listened to the Tucker Carlson interview with James (Jim) Webb, the 3rd generation Marine "war hero" who served the Controllers and further enslaved his descendants. If this weren't so sad it would be funny. 1) You go and kill people on the other side of the world. 2) You possibly lose your soul and/or your life. 3) The people who are enslaving your family steal the resources of the people you killed. 4) Your family gets further and further enslaved. 5) Brainwashed NPCs thank you for your service to the Controllers. They never stop and ask: "How many people actually make the decision to start a war?", "Who are these people?", "What are their actual interests and do they converge with the interests of your family?". As Henry Kissinger said: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." Young, healthy men who are able and willing to protect their family are going to be a problem for their governments after the coming financial reset. The two most likely solutions are wars and vaccines. I have all the respect in the world for anyone who protects their friends and family, and none for brainwashed, glorified, government yes-men.

Joe Kent, the US Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center just resigned. This guy has the highest security clearance in the entire US government, so if I had to guess, he probably has good reasons to believe this war won't end anytime soon. Also, "Director of the National Counter-terrorism Center". Most of the terrorism throughout the world is perpetrated by the CIA and Mossad (practically the same thing). The CIA has almost always used false flags to get Americans to support the next big bankers' war. However, this time there was no false flag and most Americans are seemingly opposed to this war. Did this guy think that there would be a false flag CIA operation to get more people to support this war? He "lost his life in a war manufactured by Israel", and, it was highly likely they were going to use him as a scapegoat for future false flags. As Henry Kissinger wold say: "Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy." It seems to me the US is using this war because they need a plausible reason to step down from dollar hegemony ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings ). US hegemony is expensive and brittle: - Dollar as sole reserve demands large, persistent deficits. - Weaponized finance (sanctions, seizures) pushes others to defect. A perceived defeat / stalemate against Iran provides a reason to frame: - partial dedollarization, - more multipolar arrangements, - more gold-based settlement, as reluctant necessity rather than voluntary surrender. The Controllers effectively want to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-backed settlement without a clean "US surrender". They need a credible geopolitical reason for: - US relative humiliation, - reserve shifts, - new settlement arrangements, without making it look like a board (One World Government) decision. You can think of it this way: - Current system = dollar + US Treasuries as core reserve/collateral. - Endgame = fiat currencies float, but physical gold is the final settlement asset between blocs (tokenized, physical, or rewriting ledgers in warehouses throughout the world). From last year: "China is considering setting up overseas gold warehouses to support international settlements via the Shanghai Gold Exchange, according to the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). This move aims to expand the use of the RMB benchmark internationally. The Shanghai International Gold Exchange is key to China’s de-dollarization push, offering RMB reserve holders the opportunity to convert into gold. The RMB is now used for most inbound and outbound transactions, according to the China State Administration of Foreign Exchange." ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-our-financial-system-will-look )