Firm believer in stretching. Thanks for the reminder.

Why?

Love women sports. Shoot men who try to play in women sports. 🏐

Monero is what works.

As long as they were female milking hands I would do my part. Moooo

I watched this 7 times and I still don’t know what she said.

Hardfork Nostr

Probably a new app dropped for the blind.

…out of missiles, switching to guns! Oops I think I just dropped a bomb.

Oh that is great news! I will be patiently waiting every morning. 🙏🏻🍺

Yes, Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.), the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced a bill on September 10, 2025, as part of a broader bipartisan accountability, counterterrorism, and national security. The passport revocation clause specifically targets those aiding terrorist groups, but critics argue the language is overly broad and vague, potentially allowing it to be applied to political speech or activism without full due process. For example, it could encompass individuals merely charged with material support, not just convicted ones. - Appeal Process: Affected citizens would have 60 days to appeal the decision directly to the Secretary of State, though advocates like the ACLU note this lacks meaningful oversight, as the same official who revoked the passport would review the appeal. - Hearing Schedule: The bill is set for a committee hearing on September 17, 2025, but it has not yet passed the House or advanced further. ### Controversy and Criticisms Civil liberties groups, including the ACLU and Freedom of the Press Foundation, have raised alarms that the provision could enable "thought policing" by conflating criticism of U.S. foreign policy—particularly regarding Israel—with terrorism support. This fear stems from recent actions by Rubio, who has revoked visas and green cards from foreign nationals (e.g., a Turkish student and a Columbia protest leader) over opinion pieces or activism deemed anti-Israel. Mast, a former IDF soldier who has received over $700,000 from pro-Israel groups like AIPAC, has previously advocated for deporting "terrorist sympathizers." Supporters, however, frame it as a targeted tool against actual threats like terrorists and human traffickers. The bill has sparked widespread discussion on X, with users decrying it as a threat to First Amendment rights and equating it to authoritarian overreach. It remains in early stages and could face amendments or legal challenges if it advances.

#asknostr #israel

GM, I look forward to your post every morning. A request would be a frontal sometime. Yoga short or leggings, thigh gap if possible. The usual goodness that you do. 🫡

Good morning ya’ll. ☕️ #coffeechain #bitcoin

Good idea!