v30 isn’t needed v30 is a detour. v30 says: "Can’t stop data? Just give it a bigger mailbox (OP_RETURN)." Treats the symptom (sneaky data) BUT OPENS a new door for spam, porn... Bitcoin’s original immune system. Direct fixes. Surgery, not bigger doors. Don't trust Coretards to do real work: 1) Fake keys? Delete on sight 2) Junk multisigs? Block at the gate 3) Inscription envelopes? Label as data → prune

Nash’s later writings (“Ideal Money”), Nash proposed the idea of: “A non-political money, invariant in its measure of value, resistant to manipulation.” A prophecy of Bitcoin? He believed that economic cooperation required a stable invariant standard of value, not subject to political inflation or arbitrary scaling, exactly the invariance Bitcoin enforces through: •Fixed supply (21M BTC cap), •Algorithmic issuance, •Open consensus validation. Bitcoin, in that sense, realizes Nash’s invariant cooperative ideal in digital form, a “Nash Equilibrium for Money.”

Todd and Lopp are bad actors. An Affinity scam is a type of fraud where scammers exploit a sense of trust or shared identity between themselves and their target.

Todd and Lopp are bad actors. An Affinity scam is a type of fraud where scammers exploit a sense of trust or shared identity between themselves and their target.

Asymptotically Ideal Money (AIM) or arbitrary blockchain? Lopp and Todd are bad actors.

v30 obfuscates Bitcoin’s intent. Study John Nash and his assymptotic ideal money.

It is obvious: Satoshi Nakamoto was John Nash, Bitcoin is Nash’s Asymptotic Ideal Money (AIM), and Coretards v30 departs from bitcoin original intent.

I run a Bitcoin Knots node. Bitcoin is Ideal Money. Better than sound money. Everything else is spam.

@BitcoinMike23 Bitcoin is Nash’s Whisper. The emergent infinite-equilibrium doesn’t need a war. It is an unbeatable strategy. The chaos? Noise. The end? Silence. Bitcoin wins by being the only move left. @LawrenceLepard and the gold-bugs share a 54-year-old "revolutionary" narrative. That revolutionary narrative might continue to be a delusion. Nash rejected "politically oriented thinking as essentially a hopeless waste of intellectual effort" His recovery from mental illness involved rejecting grand thinking in favor of rational-evolutionary analysis. Why "Whimper" Makes More Game-Theoretic Sense. Nash’s equilibrium thinking: No player can improve their position by unilaterally changing strategy. Central banks facing Bitcoin don't need to collapse - they need to adapt strategy to remain competitive.

Peter Todd. A programmer. Not a master of value nor economics. Coretard.

Nothing disturbs me more than the glorification of stupidity. - Carl Sagan

Is ignorance… strength?