The right phrase for "Smart" device should be "Spy" device.
People who value convenience over privacy will get burnt one day.
Even if she invested that in something that would generate 3%, she would preserve the purchasing power if inflation is not higher, but if BTC is forecasted to grow, she would still endup with less BTC in 20 years of her payout.
But she can still manage to get to one whole Bitcoin buying $1k/week in like ~6 years and that should be enough for her to retire in many countries in 2035. So having **15** BTC now or like only **2** BTC buying a weekly. She just could have so much more buying now and she would even secured that amount now. $1k in 20 years with just 2% inflation will have $667 in puchasing power. If inflation is 5% only $359. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwE6PZgWIAAh_wr?format=jpg&name=small
How much Bitcoin would you buy for $1k in 20 years if inflation keeps cutting off purchasing power of your fiat? I don't think it was a smart move. Even if Bitcoin hits only its all time high in 20 years, she still would end up with double the amount of Bitcoin buying now for the whole $1M. The only time she would endup with more BTC is if price dropped below current price for 20 years, but that would likely discourage her from buying anyway. Not to mention that right now the price of Bitcoin is near the support line of the power law.
She would definately end up with way less of Bitcoin, like is suggesting. Now she would get 15 BTC for it. Watch **sminston_with** on X - he just created **"stack early, stack hard"** episode. In like 5 years, it will be impossible for normal person to earn 1 whole Bitcoin - $1000 a week would not be enough.
Welcome to Vendetta spacestr profile!
About Me
How do you want to be part of the 1% rich group, if you do everything the same as the rest 99%?
Interests
- No interests listed.