Um and were did you get that?

why, because he actually cares about the network and wants it to be for monetary transactions?

Odell, yeah prolly

No. Not accurate at all. To much wealth literally has negative effects for on a persons cognitive abilities…

think he is just being honest. the largest dev group is compromised and the the hash rate is centralized among sect few companies

hash rate does not prevent bad actors manipulating and weakening bitcoin from the maintainer/developer level

and why is that exactly?

You are in support of large centralized mining pools interests? They always think in the short term like they did with big blocks.

If for some reason this did end in a hardfork. In no way should the anti-spam/csam version be call anything different other then “Bitcoin”. Let the spam/csam supporters think of a creative name for their blockchain.

so dont shell Bitcoin core 30 then please...