You can understand something at x3? :o

I wish it was 319 :))

"Government is nothing but men acting in concert. The Morality and value of Government, like any other association of men, will be no greater and no less than the Morality and value of the men comprising it. Since Government is nothing but men, its inherent authority' to act is in no way greater or different than the 'authority to act of individuals in isolation. Government has no 'magic powers' or 'authority' not possessed by private individuals. Let he who asserts that Government may do that which the individual may not assume the onus of proof and demonstrate his contention.” - Chris Lyspooner

Are the other books listed there also from you?

319w for 20mins is strooong!

The argument was for our evolution and in the past. Today it’s totally doable! I also like vegans 🥑

Who is more morally culpable? Order Giver or Order Follower? (Mark Passio) #asknostr

If animals have those rights and being vegan is the only morally correct way, then human species only survived by breaking those, which I find interesting. If so, would that mean that our life is morally wrong or that we loosed our right to life as we took it from someone else (animals)?

Objektiv: “fressen Energie”

From natural perspective, rights are not man made. Do animals own themselves? If yes one could argue that they also have rights. Otherwise animals would not own their body, they would just “be”… and also things they create would not belong to them. They would be property less. Slaves of nature maybe

If you click on your author hyperlink on amazon, other books in german are showing :D

In general but mainly the part from 4-5hours… Yes but if I would answer the question myself, I would also say he would argue that consciousness is needed, which animals do not have or atleast not enough of it. He clearly differentiates animals and humans.

Why do animals have no natural rights? And even if the don’t, is it ‘right’ in Mark Passios sense to kill animals?