to whomever runs nsite.cloud: You aren't invalidating cache and showing updates to nsites.

When contributors don't conform to "the message" they are pushed away.

This is the ending I saw at the beginning.

It was last year too.

Evidence in the Future Court

And when combined with https://github.com/sandwichfarm/nsite-action we can needlessly burn even more github compute :D

I am not an AI, how's that metric?

Afroman is a pretty cool wildcard ngl

Thank you for your contribution.

Fraud, black-budget projects, subsidizing GMO everything to take over the food supply and so much more!

ugh, you're*

"Your absolutely right, I should kill you. Target Locked"

GB10 is not the way.

This is the way.

keep telling yourself that.

Finally? They probably got interested when and jumped on board, so 3.5 years ago.

No.

Someone woke up and chose violence :)

Thank you for providing a logical argument in this thread. I agree with everything except that it's an intentional attack on bitcoin, more than anything it seems misguided.

You are a fantastic son.

Also, you of all people know that nsites could be resolved with nip05, or with named sites, or through a native interface locally without ever seeing a URL at all. Just needs someone to create it. IMO When promoting outside of nostr, promoting 44billion and other implementations like it makes the most sense, when promoting inside of nostr to other devs promoting nsites makes the most sense because it's the most open ended. We don't need app stores where we're going.