I think it was who implemented a twist on this with an experimental relay where users could only post at certain times. Constraints are an interesting design space.

I have mad respect for your transparency and honesty, so this question comes from a place of genuine curiosity… if history keeps repeating, do you ever sell, sit things out, and buy back in? Not trading, or calling the top, simply playing defense with your savings over a 9-12 month period? Bitcoin purity tests aside, it seems rational.

So true. Nostr is computationally irreducible, computation is the only way to arrive at an explanation.

Right, and you’ve been remarkably consistent in your advice over the years. Those who followed it have done well with no need to second guess themselves. If you can stomach the volatility, you end up with a different kind of certainty. On the other hand statements like this, while carrying risk, also seem to be historically true: “If you believe Bitcoin’s cycles revolve around halving events, then you should begin to unwind your position 350-525 days after a halving, and scale back in about a year after a clear price peak.” I’m not offering (or seeking) trading advice… it’s just an interesting paradox that blends math, psychology, and philosophy. Almost a Prisoner’s Dilemma of sorts, which is probably why consistency pays. Stay humble, stack sats becomes a self-organizing principle. Ok, brain has been recalibrated. Thanks for being an accountability partner, whether you asked for it or not. 😄