I hope so! 😂 I created an issue to add this as a new feature on our brainstorm server. Feel free to add comments or suggestions. https://github.com/NosFabrica/brainstorm_server/issues/8

I think there’s a good chance we’re going to do it — we just haven’t yet bc we’ve been more focused on making sure the main product is stable. Has anyone else implemented appendix 1 yet, enough for you to have something to play with?

Every Brainstorm user gets a personalized pubkey, like your own personalized Brainstorm Assistant, which publishes scores on your behalf. That’s the pubkey that’s in your 10040 personal preferences event. We don’t currently publish a kind 0 profile for this pubkey but it’s on our roadmap. Probably as an opt-in feature. NIP-85 was recently updated to support WoT service provider discoverability guidance — see Appendix 1 of the merged NIP. Suppose you don’t have a WoT SP and don’t know which ones are good. Following the recent NIP-85 update, you will be able to look through your follows, find who has a 10040 event, pull the WoT assistant pubkey for the “rank” metric (or perhaps for all available metrics), pull that pubkey’s kind 0, and extract the WoT SP website. You’d get a report that says something like “Looking for a WoT SP? N1 of your follows use WoT SP A at www.wot-sp-a.com, N2 use SP B, etc.”

Less than an hour away!

Could do what is doing: pull the whitelist of 100k+ pubkeys from Brainstorm and use that not only to delete old events but also to filter new events. I’d be curious to know how many GB of data that would prune away. Might want to use some more permissive settings to prune less aggressively.

I had previously signed up at brainstorm.nosfabrica.com to have WoT scores calculated. Nostria was able to communicate with the brainstorm server directly and trigger recalculation.

I just triggered recalculation of my personalized web of trust directly from the nostria.app/settings WoT page 🤯 And I can see the same scores in that I see in . Which means my WoT is not only personalized … it’s PORTABLE. 🤯🤯🤯 👏🏻 👏🏻

At we are working on a tool that will be useful in exactly this scenario. Which, as we all know, is going to be a recurring problem! Currently, the compromised account has a high WoT score using any of the currently-available WoT scoring algos. But GrapeRank has a remedy: NIP-56 reports. The GrapeRank score is currently visible to anyone who uses Brainstorm (still in alpha) on , , and any client that uses NIP-85 Trusted Assertions. A sufficient number of NIP-56 reports from trusted accounts will drive his GrapeRank score from 100 to 0. We are currently tweaking the default GrapeRank parameters that determine how many NIP-56 reports it will take to counteract the almost 2k trusted follows. If you would like to assist us in this process, then issue a NIP-56 report (report type can be other, something bespoke like “compromised”, or whatever you think is appropriate) of the compromised account, which is this one: #WoT FTW! 🍇 🧠 ⚡️

Correction: 11 am eastern, 3 pm UTC!!! (I forgot to take the recent time change into account)!

Weekly #wotathon community call is less than an hour away! 😃