„All I got from Bitcoin Core V30 is spam on the blockchain and a bunch of retarded shitcoin devs showing up at the conferences that dont run their own node!“

Bitcoin Core is a monoculture https://youtu.be/9sR-ub0eJrQ?si=3zTBsDnr7-V-P5Eo

WTF

6 Mio jews killed without Hitler knowing about it…. Fuck off Nazi

Bitcoin Core We are Bitcoin now. You will obey us.

On this day in 2002, #Tor was launched. What began as a Naval Research Lab project has grown into a global symbol of online privacy. Today, 23 years later, it’s still protecting millions.

Why Bitcoin Core V30 is flawed: Unlimited OP_RETURN is reckless CSAM is a serious attack vector Run @BitcoinKnots

So why have multiple implementations? •A monoculture results in the dominant software having too much control over the protocol direction •A bug in the reference client can bring down the entire network • Virtually all successful internet protocols have human-readable specs (RFCs) backed by multiple independently developed implementations — Dave Collins, May 2013

Running Bitcoin Knots

It must hurt so bad that bitcoin knots is winning

Sad to see that you dont stand up against spam but are now part pf the VC ecosystem

The Bitcoin Cantillon Effect If fiat money creates insiders close to the money printer… does Bitcoin have its own? Are early adopters, miners, and devs the ones sitting closest to new issuance? Do OGs act like a kind of mafia, protecting their influence over code, culture, and capital? And if so … is Bitcoin really an escape from the Cantillon Effect, or just a new version with different gatekeepers?