Even if a fork results in a chain split, you can just hang on to both sides of the split until the dust settles.

After all that gaslighting about miner centralization, fee estimation, and ineffectiveness of filters. We finally get a mask off moment. This is the real reason Core hates filters.

Imagine a successful company trying to copy its failed competitors. That's what Core's strategy is

It's Five Alive going into Week 11. Talks of a chop are getting serious. The Five Are: newcomer Satoshi Sharps regular HammerBro88 and nostr's own

Coretards Orange Pilling

We're down to the Elite Eight. Last Year's Circa Finalist BIG_HOUSE is out! Once again with a Packer picker. Also eliminated is last year's Satoshi Sharps finalist. SURVIVE!

Yes, the shitcoiners are lying about BIP444

The only person who gets to determine what goes in your mempool is you. Not bCore, not F2Pool, not even AntPool. If you're struggling with this reality, you're likely a JPEGger

Knotti Bois be like

They hate that you run a node. It frustrates them

Let's do a quick thought experiment. Imagine a government becomes opposed to how certain people are using Bitcoin. In response, it establishes a group to pay Core devs to change Bitcoin Core software. Pays large centralized pools to run this software. Claims anyone opposing any of this is not technically literate. Would you go along with this?