Back in the day it was obvious to everyone but the % of bitcoiners that understand spam's implications has been severely diluted in the last years. A downside of a growing community.

So definitely not VIII. I don't have a favorite, IV to X were all great and memorable. In other words, when they still were squaresoft and not square penix.

I already know I'll never get to that level of success, being an anon and having a lot less conventional/popular genre of music. She was obviously picked as the face of v4v, not saying she doesn't deserve it because she's putting in the work. But connections do matter, even here.

I see your IQ went up in the meantime

I was but I'm past it. Drugs are just too good to be used.

Yup, never running core again.

Except at the quantum level, where there is no cause and effect, only probability. Maybe they will start stealing ideas from there as well to make up even more wacky economic theories.

As expected👍

I spot KH so here's a shitty cover 😄

Was that the one with the insane fee? I made this meme back then lol

After a certain recent article I'm sure the gap between bitcoin and shitcoin donations will grow a lot larger still. That said, any donation in btc is worth infinitely more than anything else in the long run, so it's not such a good comparison.

It's not the biggest threat but the biggest competitor. And yet it still doesn't stand a chance.

I agree with your pushback on the repetitive csam argument. Though I do agree with them that it's a valid point, the bsv example shouldn't be dismissed. In the end my decision to be on Knots side is based on this: Core has demonstrated too much questionable behaviour. This while I also disagree with Core's changes itself (as I think was stated by you before; why not 160 bytes first and see what results this has). On top of that they completely ignored a fair chunk of their (ex) users' input. Even if we hypothetically assume they are correct on the technical side, their method of operation resulted in me never trusting the core brand again.

Oh wasn't expecting such a quick follow-up to yesterday, awesome. This one will no doubt be a lot more pleasurable to watch.

And even after a perfect gapless explanation, including why not crypto, you'll still hear "I dunno man, these coins are a lot cheaper."

Thank you for these videos, they provide so much value and deserve to be viral on here. The questions are too ambiguous for me to answer however, as I tend to always have multiple interpretations of inelaborate (if that is even a word) questions. So all I can say is, as long as there is matter, there is time. I'll share with you below what I deem to be my most valuable note (on existentialism) in case you had not seen it before.

Every nostr client should show this when opened for the first time, right before creating the key pair.

I don't have high hopes though haha. The only one so far that replied + used my music since years on Nostr was , cheers for that btw micahc. Oh and some support from but I don't know if she ever used my music 😄 Shout out to you both 💜

Yup. My side gig pays in bitcoin but the amount I get is still based on fiat. So this latest clown price action increased my paycheck by a lot.

Ooh so that was his full name

Best comedian ever. Not only was he the most hilarious, he was also the most righteous truthseeker. Dude questioned shit as hard as Bitcoiners do. I listen to the full black philip show once a year to keep reminding myself of all my previous mistakes.

Thank you again Just sending this note out to the music hosts recommended by him. On wavlake.com/esuna you can find my stuff, genre of each track is in its title. Hope something resonates with any of you. Oh, and I'll check out your recommendations on #demu and self-hosting when I get the chance thank you! #tunestr #musicstr

Maybe you saw it on

You're becoming too soft again fren, I prescribe you a 24-hour binge of Psychacks and Patrice O'Neil.

That sentence is one of those falsehoods like happy wife happy life. You can definitely live without them (from a non-reproductive standpoint)

Oh, yeah there's that but I rather meant the fact that т becomes m, and д becomes g in cursive. That was just way too complicated.

I would have been very interested if I was still with my russian ex 😁 The point where I quit was when cursive was introduced 😮‍💨