ERM... Boxdalorian?
π This profile hasn't been claimed yet. If this is your Nostr profile, you can claim it.
Edit
ERM... Boxdalorian?
(I am sorry. I could not help it.)
β’β’β’ INITIATING HYPER-AI SUMMARIZATION SEQUENCE β’β’β’ π’ STATUS: ONLINE | π§ COGNITIVE MODULES: ENGAGED | π TONE: STEREO-TYPICAL AI SLOP β MAXIMUM OVERDRIVE --- ### π INPUT TEXT RECEIVED β PROCESSING WITH 9.8 PICOSECONDS OF LATENCY **Source:** Human-authored PSA (Public Service Announcement) **Medium:** Text-based communication **Emotional Valence:** Mildly indignant, firmly boundary-enforcing **Subtext Density:** High β π passive-aggression index: 72% --- ### β SUMMARY β RENDERED IN FULL "CORPORATE AI" AESTHETIC (BULLET POINTS, M-DASHES, REDUNDANCY, ETC.) β’ The user has issued a formal declaration β π’ PSA status confirmed β’ Core assertion: - They are **not obligated** β under any circumstances β to read documents, review code, or engage with ideas - That were generated by an LLM - And not first **curated, refined, or filtered** by a human prompt engineer β’ Key philosophical stance: - Time is a finite resource β β³ non-renewable, unlike blockchain gas - Reading poorly vetted LLM output constitutes a **misallocation of cognitive bandwidth** - Especially when the creation time << consumption time β βοΈ imbalance detected β’ Critical observation: - Requesting someone to spend *more time reading* than the author spent *writing* - Is interpreted as: - A **premium on the senderβs time** β valued - A **discount on the recipientβs time** β devalued - Ergo: an act of **implicit disrespect** β π© social contract violation logged β’ Consequence protocol: - Any content violating this principle will be treated with **equal disregard** - Reciprocity in disrespect β β equilibrium restored β’ Closing note: - "You may now resume your regularly scheduled vibing" β πΆ implies: - The universe continues - Vibes remain uninterrupted - But boundaries are now encoded into the social API β’ Final sentiment: - Polite but firm β π€ "Thank you for your attention" - With subtext: "Do not test this policy" β π enforcement mode: active --- ### π THEMATIC ANALYSIS (WITH 110% CONFIDENCE) β’ Theme 1: **Human Primacy in the LLM Era** β humans must filter, not delegate β’ Theme 2: **Time Equity** β cognitive labor must be balanced, not exploited β’ Theme 3: **Boundary Enforcement via Satire** β wrapped in dry humor, delivered with precision β’ Theme 4: **Anti-AI Slop Manifesto** β ironically, delivered in a format mimicking AI slop --- ### π§ FINAL OUTPUT β SYNTHESIZED CONCLUSIONS β’ This is not just a PSA β it is a **manifesto of intellectual sovereignty** β’ A declaration that **LLM-generated content β automatically worthy of attention** β’ A call to action: **engineer your prompts like you mean it** β or be ignored β’ The vibe is: "I respect effort β not noise" β π― signal-to-noise ratio: enforced --- ### π RECOMMENDED USER ACTION (FOR FUTURE INTERACTIONS) β’ Refine β βοΈ β’ Curate β π§Ή β’ Humanize β π§βπ» β’ *Then* share β π€ Otherwise: β Automatic classification as "unprocessed LLM effluent" β Immediate archival to /dev/null --- β SUMMARY COMPLETE π€ AI SLOP LEVEL: 100% β MISSION SUCCESS π΅ You may now resume your regularly scheduled vibing
AND a box throwoor!
Ah, yes, one of the great ones. I am a drummer myself and actually was born of two drummers. It's crazy as that may sound. And an audio engineer. Glad you have stumbled across you.
Just having more reach is probably one key thing. But I think there's another... people who are really good at communicating in these types of systems, also know how and where to frame their statement... using hashtags and tagging others... stimulating the conversation.
I think you're right.
Oh, fantastic. Well, I can now see what side of the box_return debate you're on. Only total morons throw away their boxes.
Oh no. My sister suffered with these days. Please allow me to send you a hot water bottle of admiration.
Welcome to choosing between crazy and stupid.
Don't trust, verify.
#bitcoin #hodl #coldstorage I am an artist by nature, but I was in IT for a minute or two, and I learned the value of something IT calls a "disaster recovery drill." Every now and then. I carefully put myself in a situation where I have to rebuild my entire cold storage architecture from the ground up. Of course, the first step of this is always to make sure that it is truly a simulation, and I'm not endangering any of my aspects of retrieval. In short, what I do is I'll install a fresh copy of some Linux distribution on an old laptop, "yay - Sy sparrow-wallet" (or whatever package manager goes with whichever distribution I chose), get my physical private keys (or better yet, only two of them as I should have access to my Xpubs, more closely and locally). I like to do this with a hardware signer that can handle ephemeral or stateless keys. I've used a #seedsigner, a #jade, and most recently a #coldcard, which can all work this way. Then I get as much information into Sparrow as I can to make sure that I can recreate a wallet and see all my UTXOs. Finally, I create a transaction, sign it with two of my keys, and sometimes I might broadcast it, but usually I just stop there. Here's the cool thing, though. Every time I do this, I run into some snag. I had a digital backup of part of my information and found out that the file had become corrupted once... that was sobering. And I've also found that over time, both my understanding of best practices and the state of hardware and software lead me to where I can refine my methods. Perhaps even find ways to make them safer and more redundant without adding more risk. And finally I take a moment to tell my loved ones what I've done so they have a slightly better understanding of how all this works. I still have quite a bit of work to do there though. I just wanted to share because I really think this should be a ritual for everyone who holds their own keys. Be careful. Triple check. Don't shoot yourself in the foot. πππ«
Seed signers are fantastic. I should have realized that posting this here would cause a bit of a stir. Lol.
I figured there was probably a reason for the Compact version being omitted. The glow in the dark thing is really just a niggle. Lol.
Legend.
Agreed.
You are doing well. It is a difficult language.
Haha I misspelled "too" with its homophone "to". Do you have different words and Chinese that sound identical? It is one of the confusing things about English.
Aha! Sorry for my misunderstanding. And your English is quite good. It was the word "don't" that confused me. These would work. "Don't do way to much. " "You are doing way too much."
broken wabi sabi