Yes. I wouldn’t need the insurance if I could trust that the BTC would be there in the future for me to spend. The blockchain creates that trust. The extension of that trust is human. I need to back up my pneumonic, store it somewhere reliable, know how to restore, etc. I trust myself with the depth of those requirements. I would pay for the Anchorwatch custody product as an alternative to Casa: because of your miniscript solution and my trust in the blockchain. I’m trying to describe why I also want the Anchorwatch Custody solution. I view it as a vault I can set a timer and walk away without worry similar to Casa. I believe the industry needs this alternative
Cycle
21d
Cycle
21d
Off the top of my head I can think of 5 companies launched in 2025 with good products for lending or treasury custody; personal or business; single or multisig. I can’t trust any because they have no history of success and the legal is too much to understand. Outsourcing my trust to the blockchain would be a step improvement beyond even well respected company products from Casa and Unchained
Cycle
21d
Everyone is looking for a set it and forget it solution. Relying on a crypto company, a tradfi bank, or yourself is a lot of maintenance and trust. Letting the blockchain do the work without that overhead is quite valuable
Welcome to Cycle spacestr profile!
About Me
Interests
- No interests listed.
Videos
Music
My store is coming soon!