Indestructible.

Is there a black hat with green text?

We were dealt the winning hand. All in.

If there was a Mount Rushmore for Bitcoin privacy devs, 3 out of the 4 heads would be making different faces.

PoC coming soon.

It's already baked in to The Four Horsemen, but it should be upstreamed to Payjoin: In order to comply with this spec, wallet synchronization must be performed using compact block filters or the user’s full node *by default*. A client that passively intercepts coinjoin data from users should be considered .

I am going to propose an edit to BIP77 first. Default network level privacy is a critical prerequisite for any payjoin BIP compliance: - Senders are disincentivized from opting in to payjoin by default since the receiver might be using a third party Electrum server. Their fee will be wasted, and chainalysis will intercept their data. - Receivers are disincentivized from opting in to payjoin by default since the sender might be using a third party Electrum server. Their UTXO consolidation will be covertly exposed, and chainalysis will intercept their data. - These compounding disincentives undermine the meta goal of payjoin, which is to dilute the certainty of mappings for any 2+ input 2+ output transaction. - Third party Electrum servers create a perverse incentive between devs and their users, giving them privileged access to the data of users of unrelated wallets. - Third party Electrum servers create a honeypot target, creating a dangerous environment for wallet developers.

Even if a user doesn't care about their privacy at all, there is still a cost advantage for switching to a Four Horsemen supporting wallet. Incentives matter in order to achieve privacy by default.

All the prerequisite software exists, it's just scattered around. It could be assembled from Wasabi 1.0, Wasabi 2.0, and JoinMarket (all of these have overlapping payjoin support).

Wasn't Samourai both a Ten31 VC investment and Opensats donation beneficiary?