I wanted to transfer simple strings or passwords between my mobile and PC without using email or existing messengers, and I thought Nostr was optimized for this purpose. However, I found that there was surprisingly limited support for desktop use. I didn't consider the browser web app because I dislike having to click multiple times to navigate to the specific tab. Gossip was the most well-known desktop client, but it didn't support Bunker login. While Bunker itself works, it was strange that I couldn't log in through Bunker.

is finally working properly on my PC. I used to have issues where a left click would be recognized as a right click, or I could send messages in the chat but not receive them. However, after the recent update, everything seems to be functioning perfectly.

라이트닝 네트워크가 활성화 된 뒤로 온체인 트랜잭션이 많이 줄어서 금액에 따라 다르긴 한데, 온체인 전송이 수수료가 더 쌀 수도 있습니다. 라이트닝 트랜잭션은 말그대로 소액전용이라고 보시면 됩니다. 라이트닝 결제는 온체인 결제와 달리 전송금액에 비례하는 수수료를 떼거든요 그리고 본문내용으로 추정컨데 채널 관리까지 하실걸 염두에 두고 계신 진짜 셀프 커스토디얼 방식으로 운영하시려는 걸로 보입니다. 그러면 채널을 열어줄 사람이 없으면 최초에 인바운드 유동성이 없어서 dca한 비트코인을 받을 여유가 없을 수도 있어요! 저같은 경우는 요즘은 온체인 수수료도 싸겠다(2000 사토시에 출금가능할 때도 있을 정도) 그냥 온체인으로 받고 맙니다 ㅋㅋ

I've noticed some non-KYC AI services that charge per question rather than using a subscription model. Some of these use Lightning Network for payments, providing an API key that gets debited with each use. Going even further, I've seen services that use Cashu, embedding the bearer token in the header to pay "truly" per query. I'm curious about how this works. Cashu tokens aren't fixed keys and become unusable after a single use. Does this mean the header token needs to be replaced with each query? Before a response is generated, it's impossible to know the exact cost of that query. What token is put in the header? And since the cost is unlikely to match the token's exact value, does this mean a token with a larger denomination is used, and the change is refunded somehow? Is the refund attached to the response? #asknostr

1. 코인을 보내고 받으러면 라이트닝 노드가 켜져 있어야 하긴 한데 좀 끈다고 채널이 자동으로 닫히거나 하지는 않습니다. 다만 자주 껐다키면 채널 상대방 쪽이 관리 명목으로 채널을 닫아버릴 순 있습니다. 2. 가능합니다. 다만 수수료는 좀 듭니다. 그런데 비트코인을 주기적으로 받을 일이 없다면(즉 비트코인 결제를 받는 매장주인이 아니라면) 거의 쓰기만 하실 거라서 최초의 넣은 돈 이상으로 늘어날 일 자체가 거의 없을 걸요?

I’m curious about Amethyst’s outbox model. Considering that many users stick to the default settings, the relay sets for the people one follows won’t all be unique and will overlap quite a bit. In that case, when querying relays, does the client aggregate as many public keys as the relay can handle on the client side and query that way, or does it query separately for each follow list to reduce complexity? I assume it’s the former.

Lately, Amber keeps breaking on me (it suddenly shuts down and then no matter what I do, it absolutely won’t start again). I’m not sure if it’s my phone’s issue or Amber’s. Given that my phone is really old and no one else seems to be talking about this, it’s probably my phone issue. But every Nostr client app I use also fails to launch properly when Amber has issues. Instead of not working at all when Amber isn’t responding, I wish they’d behave like an npub login mode—but that’s probably hard to do, right? It does seem difficult.

I've noticed a few things while looking at the data on my personal Nostr relay: If I receive all events without any filtering, most of them turn out to be spam. There are more attempts to delete than I expected, which might mean users are having a not-so-good experience. Surprisingly, a lot of posts from people I don't know end up on my relay for some reason. I'm really curious about the third point. Why would anyone publish to my relay?

Democracy will be delivered 😇